Question 15 (c) is almost identical to 2016 BOS Trials 3U Q14.Wow last Q. was derangements, something covered in a past 4U BOS Trial (the 2014 one I think) from memory!
Yeah looking at that question I was also thinking I'd seen it in some paper (was also thinking a BOS Trial) somewhere recently.Question 15 (c) is almost identical to 2016 BOS Trials 3U Q14.
Definitely much harder than 2015 for me.What's everyone thinking of in difficulty in terms of previous years? Personally I found that Question 16 was slightly less accessible, but apart from that not too bad overall.
I found it easier than previous years, to be honest. Lots of questions felt like they had lengthy algebra, but didn't require too much thinking.What's everyone thinking of in difficulty in terms of previous years? Personally I found that Question 16 was slightly less accessible, but apart from that not too bad overall.
Edit: Also, what do you think was needed for an e4?
Damn, that was actually pretty easy.
Is the general consensus then that it was easy this year but just had Q's involving lots of tedious algebra?I found it easier than previous years, to be honest. Lots of questions felt like they had lengthy algebra, but didn't require too much thinking.
Well, out of my cohort of 7, the consensus was that the whole paper was easy. I didn't really think the algebra was too tedious honestly, maybe a couple questions here and there, but overall it wasn't that bad. A lot of people seemed to skip 16 though.Is the general consensus then that it was easy this year but just had Q's involving lots of tedious algebra?
Do you think there was a bit too much guidance given in some places? (It seems like that in some places to me, made some of the questions much easier.)Well, out of my cohort of 7, the consensus was that the whole paper was easy. I didn't really think the algebra was too tedious honestly, maybe a couple questions here and there, but overall it wasn't that bad. A lot of people seemed to skip 16 though.
Yeah honestly. Some of the marks were just way too easy to obtain, especially in the last question, seeing as though that question should be very difficult. And then there was that ellipse question. I don't know how that was worth 4%.Do you think there was a bit too much guidance given in some places? (It seems like that in some places to me, made some of the questions much easier.)
Ah yeah, you're right. Took a look at that ellipse Q. and the marks there are essentially all standard. But I think one reason they ask Q's like that is to try and make sure everyone can at least get some marks.Yeah honestly. Some of the marks were just way too easy to obtain, especially in the last question, seeing as though that question should be very difficult. And then there was that ellipse question. I don't know how that was worth 4%.
EDIT: Yeah just skimmed it again, I forgot how much they held your hand in question 14.
Yeah I guess that makes sense.Ah yeah, you're right. Took a look at that ellipse Q. and the marks there are essentially all standard. But I think one reason they ask Q's like that is to try and make sure everyone can at least get some marks.
I don't really think it was easier, around the same difficulty. I don't know the general consensus though, my cohort is too small to get a good idea of that.Please tell me you don't think it was easier than 2014 and 2015.