after an extensive look at the paper. I have made a conclusion. Here are my thoughts
The paper is still just as shit as the old syllabus papers. Literally all it has is 3 'actual' calculations that aren't just trivial substitution.
Lol what a joke, this kind of exam provides nothing but an illusion for future Physics majors. Unless you've done contest Physics, this crap is still useless.
20) - I would say it's a bit too easy just because it's literally a standard scenario students learn in the syllabus. You know the theme park one where there's people inside a centrifuge and the centrifuge is spun but the people stay stuck to the wall. Same thing.
29) - Come ooon. 3 marks for this what a joke. Way too easy. All there is to it is
Should've been 2 marks
30(a) - Poorly written. Instead of a ball, the use of a block would've been ideal. Being a ball it also has a rotational Kinetic energy given by
Like come on say it's a block so you don't break the laws of Physics :\
35 - Useless question. It's so trivial to do and is literally a standard result in Maths Ext 2. Doing 4u literally gives you an advantage :\
Rest of the paper - Total shitshow
*End of rant*