mr.habibbi
Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2019
- Messages
- 41
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2021
hey all, got a q, doesn't seem too hard but i cant get LHS=RHS in last step
Put under common denominator and use long division.hey all, got a q, doesn't seem too hard but i cant get LHS=RHS in last step
Long division? It's just a normal induction question. subbing in the 2nd step (n=k) into 3rd step (n=k+1) shouldn't be that difficult. Just don't make any silly mistakes.Put under common denominator and use long division.
I have.try it
Add .hey all, got a q, doesn't seem too hard but i cant get LHS=RHS in last step
I've never seen an induction q be solved like that. I would have just done n=k n=k+1 but I guess this works as well.Add .
Now, each step above is reversible and so it is sufficient to prove the standard result, , to also prove the required result.
I have the advantage of having seen the standard questions a lot of ties, so I recognise that the question took a standard result and tweaked it. The idea is that shortcuts can save you time to use on other questions, if you spot them, but no one is expected to see all the shortcuts that might exist.I've never seen an induction q be solved like that. I would have just done n=k n=k+1 but I guess this works as well.
People posting here, whether it be fellow students, former students, Moderators, etc, do so to get help / learn and to help others. I don't know whether your comment above is directed at me or at @Life'sHard or at someone else, but in any case, I don't appreciate it.do this since ur so smart
mb just banter with my mate @Life'sHardPeople posting here, whether it be fellow students, former students, Moderators, etc, do so to get help / learn and to help others. I don't know whether your comment above is directed at me or at @Life'sHard or at someone else, but in any case, I don't appreciate it.
Glad to hear it. You might want to bear in mind that tone of voice and the like are not well-conveyed in text form. Your comment evidently read to me as harsh in a way that you didn't intend.mb just banter with my mate @Life'sHard
How do you prove this?View attachment 32200
do this since ur so smart
should wait for @Life'sHard solutionHow do you prove this?
I'm doing tutor hw atm lmao. I'll try and give it a shot afterwards. I've seen this type of question before, so hopefully I can still crack it.How do you prove this?
Is this from the hurlstone paper which just requires a butt-load of algebra?should wait for @Life'sHard solution
Idk if it's hurlstone or not. But yeah the algebra is kinda nuts if you solve it via mathematical induction wth. Is there another way to solve this? Cause I've had to do induction twice and I'm not seeing the end of the tunnel yet.Is this from the hurlstone paper which just requires a butt-load of algebra?
Check hurlstone mx2 2020 q16 (b) solutionIdk if it's hurlstone or not. But yeah the algebra is kinda nuts if you solve it via mathematical induction wth. Is there another way to solve this? Cause I've had to do induction twice and I'm not seeing the end of the tunnel yet.