So it is my understanding that band (band 1 to 6) is determined by your aligned marks, which is of course determined by your raw marks. My question is how does ranking play a part in determining my band. And if it does, how would ranking affect me, given that I'm ranked dismally (like 50/60). Also my average raw mark is 43/100, which includes all my internal exams and my external hsc exam (estimated what I got in hsc using the answers that got released).
Essentially, at the end of your internal assessments your school would have submitted to NESA a
raw assessment mark. Now, this mark is not disclosed to you but rather expressed as a rank order. I.e. if there are three students with raw assessment marks 52, 78, 95 the student with 95 would be ranked 1, 78 rank 2 and so on.
Now, NESA locks this raw mark away until after your HSC exam where it gets all of the
HSC examination marks of your cohort and calculates the mean.
Moderation is where NESA adjusts the
mean of your cohort's internal, assessment marks to match the
mean of your cohort's external, examination marks. Throughout this moderation process, NESA will
retain the rank order of your cohort when determining the
moderated, internal assessment mark which therefore means that your rank is crucial as it will determine the moderation of your assessment mark in line with your cohort's HSC performance.
So, at the end of this process, you will have two marks: a raw moderated assessment mark and a raw examination mark, which now have to be aligned!
Jimmy already described the alignment process above so I won't go over it again but I hope I've outlined the relationship between ranking, moderation and hence band performance.