• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Chemistry Exam Predictions/Thoughts (1 Viewer)

izzyheslop

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
14
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2021
pls someone clarify in NMR if the proton is in an OH group that doesn't count as an environment right? it won't be on the spectra?
 

XXXPUMPERXXX

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
58
Location
sigma male suburb
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Uni Grad
2025
Why do you guys always have to study from textbooks that are 20 years old ? Anyways for the question it may be because they increase in the same ratio
 

beaniebabie

New Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2020
Messages
9
Gender
Female
HSC
2021
Le why is it not A :confused2::confused2::confused2::confused2::cry:
we want to be looking at the way the curves counteract the change. if you look at the curves after the reaction was subjected to a change in volume/pressure, they all counteract the change by the same amount. so it must mean that they are equal in stochiometric ratios. if that makes sense?
1638002136834.png
 

izzyheslop

New Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
14
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2021
we want to be looking at the way the curves counteract the change. if you look at the curves after the reaction was subjected to a change in volume/pressure, they all counteract the change by the same amount. so it must mean that they are equal in stochiometric ratios. if that makes sense?
View attachment 34259
thanks bestie don't mind me I am fuckin DUMB
 

uart

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2008
Messages
69
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Le why is it not A :confused2::confused2::confused2::confused2::cry:
You can also verify it's C by reading off the exact values of the concs, and then calculating the equilb constant ratios with both the initial and final values. You'll find A just doesn't work numerically. The soln given by Beanie above is a lot quicker though.
 
Last edited:

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Regarding the CSSA 2021 paper, it should be noted that there were a lot of mistakes:
  • In question 2, none of the equations are correct. The answer is meant to be D but there is a typo in the formula for aluminium carbonate. It should be Al2(CO3)3 but has been incorrectly written as Al2(CO2)3.
  • Question 20 has no correct answer, which is 0.0124 mol L-1. The answer given, C, is 0.00502 mol L-1 is the concentration of lead ions in the solution when the precipitate first forms, but the question asked for the concentration in the aliquot.
  • Not a mistake, but question 26(b) can be done with a variety of methods.
  • Few people will notice, but the graph in question 27 is wrong. If you use the periods when the system is at equilibrium to estimate the equilibrium constant, you will find that it is roughly K = 0.097 to start with, decreases to K = 0.046 after the temperature change (which is fine), but then after the volume change it decreases again to K = 0.015. The movements in concentration following the volume change are in the right direction but they should be changes of roughly 0.25 mol L-1.
  • Question 33 begins by stating that isomers have formula C4H8O. There are quite a few possible alcohols with this MF, but I can't think of any that has a 1H NMR spectrum like the one shown. Further, the question gives the relative areas for the five hydrogen environments as 3:3:2:1:1, which means the compound has 10 hydrogen atoms! There are only four possible alcohols with MF of C4H10O, one of which (2-butanol) matches the given NMR spectrum. I conclude that the question starts with the wrong formula and I wonder how many students were confused by this mistake and lost time.
  • Question 34 asserts that "... whereas amphiprotic sodium hydrogen carbonate forms a solution with a pH of 1." This is preposterous, ridiculous, absurd, wrong, and total and complete bovine waste product. Sodium hydrogencarbonate is amphiprotic but is actually a weak base. If it truly had a pH of 1, its conjugate acid (carbonic acid, which is weak, pKa = 6.8) would need to have a pH that was negative. Looking at the solutions, I have found that the question is meant to say that "sodium hydrogen sulfate forms a solution with a pH of 1." This is at least an acidic substance, and it is formally amphiprotic in that it has a conjugate acid and a conjugate base. However, having hydrogensulfate accept a proton and form sulfuric acid (which is strong, with a pKa of -2.8) would require unusual circumstances. The hydrogensulfate ion has a pKa of 2 and so would need to be present in a concentration of 1.0 mol L-1 to have a pH of 1.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
pls someone clarify in NMR if the proton is in an OH group that doesn't count as an environment right? it won't be on the spectra?
The H on OH should appear in hydrogen NMR spectra, somewhere between 1 and 5 ppm (it is difficult to predict). It generally does not cause splitting, however.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
You can also verify it's C by reading off the exact values of the concs, and then calculating the equilb constant ratios with both the initial and final values. You'll find A just doesn't work numerically. The soln given by Beanie above is a lot quicker though.
You should be able to do this, but a surprising number of these types of graphs are drawn incorrectly with the final concentrations wrong. Look at the 2021 CSSA, for example.
 

Siwel

Active Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Messages
208
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
You should be able to do this, but a surprising number of these types of graphs are drawn incorrectly with the final concentrations wrong. Look at the 2021 CSSA, for example.
Any tips on how to know what addition or substitution reaction is occuring in reaction pathways, seem to always stuff up on this particularly with the cssa 2021 one
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Addition needs an alkene. Substitution is typical for haloalkanes and alcohols undergo substitution (along with other reactions)
 
Joined
Nov 6, 2021
Messages
61
Location
Hell
Gender
Male
HSC
2021
Regarding the CSSA 2021 paper, it should be noted that there were a lot of mistakes:
  • In question 2, none of the equations are correct. The answer is meant to be D but there is a typo in the formula for aluminium carbonate. It should be Al2(CO3)3 but has been incorrectly written as Al2(CO2)3.
  • Question 20 has no correct answer, which is 0.0124 mol L-1. The answer given, C, is 0.00502 mol L-1 is the concentration of lead ions in the solution when the precipitate first forms, but the question asked for the concentration in the aliquot.
  • Not a mistake, but question 26(b) can be done with a variety of methods.
  • Few people will notice, but the graph in question 27 is wrong. If you use the periods when the system is at equilibrium to estimate the equilibrium constant, you will find that it is roughly K = 0.097 to start with, decreases to K = 0.046 after the temperature change (which is fine), but then after the volume change it decreases again to K = 0.015. The movements in concentration following the volume change are in the right direction but they should be changes of roughly 0.25 mol L-1.
  • Question 33 begins by stating that isomers have formula C4H8O. There are quite a few possible alcohols with this MF, but I can't think of any that has a 1H NMR spectrum like the one shown. Further, the question gives the relative areas for the five hydrogen environments as 3:3:2:1:1, which means the compound has 10 hydrogen atoms! There are only four possible alcohols with MF of C4H10O, one of which (2-butanol) matches the given NMR spectrum. I conclude that the question starts with the wrong formula and I wonder how many students were confused by this mistake and lost time.
  • Question 34 asserts that "... whereas amphiprotic sodium hydrogen carbonate forms a solution with a pH of 1." This is preposterous, ridiculous, absurd, wrong, and total and complete bovine waste product. Sodium hydrogencarbonate is amphiprotic but is actually a weak base. If it truly had a pH of 1, its conjugate acid (carbonic acid, which is weak, pKa = 6.8) would need to have a pH that was negative. Looking at the solutions, I have found that the question is meant to say that "sodium hydrogen sulfate forms a solution with a pH of 1." This is at least an acidic substance, and it is formally amphiprotic in that it has a conjugate acid and a conjugate base. However, having hydrogensulfate accept a proton and form sulfuric acid (which is strong, with a pKa of -2.8) would require unusual circumstances. The hydrogensulfate ion has a pKa of 2 and so would need to be present in a concentration of 1.0 mol L-1 to have a pH of 1.
there were sooo many mistakes 😂... do they even bother proof reading it?
and there were mistakes in other cssa papers too, in software there was a question not even relevant to the syllabus
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
there were sooo many mistakes 😂... do they even bother proof reading it?
and there were mistakes in other cssa papers too, in software there was a question not even relevant to the syllabus
This one is unusually bad for CSSA standards. Checking thoroughly is not that easy, either - many people wouldn't notice a detail like the mistake in q2 or the flaw in the equilibrium graph.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top