![[Blank]](/data/avatars/m/1611363/1611363613.jpg?1692840869){kind=avatar}
[Blank]
[Blank]
But I'm not devoted towards that.
I want a vision that is akin to the hype from the classroom of the elite idea, whether it may be STEM related or not.
-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
GENERAL BIO DISCUSSION (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter SadCeliac
- Start date
I want a vision that is akin to the hype from the classroom of the elite idea, whether it may be STEM related or not.
[Blank]
[Blank]
check whatsapp
youraverageangel
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2023
- Messages
- 130
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
Awff topic, but since this is a general bio discussion page,
How do you structure an evaluate bio question? The question is: Evaluate the validity of the method of <insert epidemiological study> [6 marks]
How do you structure an evaluate bio question? The question is: Evaluate the validity of the method of <insert epidemiological study> [6 marks]
you need to make a judgement
e.g. the method was extremely effective at linking banging a head against the wall to testicular cancer
its_ace21
/æɪs/
youraverageangel
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2023
- Messages
- 130
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
thanks
anytime, im full of great examplesthanks
synthesisFR
afterhscivemostlybeentrollingdonttakeitsrsly
R u okay
It's a valid epidemiological study, we can test now:
synthesis you go bang your head on your wall
and ill come check if you get testicular cancer
synthesisFR
afterhscivemostlybeentrollingdonttakeitsrsly
noIt's a valid epidemiological study, we can test now:
synthesis you go bang your head on your wall
and ill come check if you get testicular cancer
goodcat911
......
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2022
- Messages
- 167
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2024
Define the epidemiological study.
Outline the method for it.
Define the term "validity".
2 reasons for why it is valid. Good to use examples.
2 reasons for why it isn't valid. Good to use examples.
Concluding statement with your own judgement (Do you think it's valid based on your reasons?).
its_ace21
/æɪs/
its_ace21
/æɪs/
"In July 2022, the Australian Red Cross annoucned that ppl who had been in the UK between 1980-1996 were now allowed to donate blood.
Why had this group of Australians been previously baaned from making blood donations?"
WHAT WE DIDNT LEARN THIS WE ONLY LEARNT EBOLA TF HAPPENED IN THE UK
this is a trial q btww
Why had this group of Australians been previously baaned from making blood donations?"
WHAT WE DIDNT LEARN THIS WE ONLY LEARNT EBOLA TF HAPPENED IN THE UK
this is a trial q btww
synthesisFR
afterhscivemostlybeentrollingdonttakeitsrsly
stfu u dont need to know this they cant ask a specific case study for that dotpoint since its general so just know the one u learnt u buffoon
its_ace21
/æɪs/
still gonna fail bio
its_ace21
/æɪs/
"A student made the following statement
'Crossing over violates Mendel's laws of random segregation and Independent assortment'
Evaluate the accuracy of the following statement. Use labelled diagrams to support your answer"
who what why AND ITS 7 MARKS
'Crossing over violates Mendel's laws of random segregation and Independent assortment'
Evaluate the accuracy of the following statement. Use labelled diagrams to support your answer"
who what why AND ITS 7 MARKS
are you all good now?????
its_ace21
/æɪs/
NO ANSWER MY NEW QUESTION PLEASE
yeah they give us a stim if they give us a case study lmao
q would probably be to evaluate effectiveness of the campaign or something
like the 'smoking kills' aus one where they tax the fuck out of cigarettes etc