breadcrumbs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2023
- Messages
- 200
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2023
my schools avg was like 30 or 40 something and only one person got above 80
CSSA trial (advanced/ extension maths) (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Ivy h
- Start date
There are 2 versions of the 2023 ext. 2 cssa, one with Q11d uncorrected and the other has it corrected. If you happen to get the uncorrected cssa, I should point out that there is an error in the original paper.
The one I used was the corrected version Q11d:
You will see "at rest" is crossed out.
Obviously if it is at rest at the origin it would not have that equation.
Last edited:
i did solutions to 2024 ext 1 and 2 cssa
many of my methods differ from cssa solution methods often leading to more efficient soutions
many of my methods differ from cssa solution methods often leading to more efficient soutions
Whatmathsdoineed
New Member
- Joined
- May 12, 2024
- Messages
- 28
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2024
tywebb do u have standard by any chance
bruhmoment.
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2023
- Messages
- 245
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2024
yo just wanted to ask, how did u figure out how to do q10 of the 3u cssa 2024 exam. I've literally not heard a SINGLE person that hasn't guessed it. everyone just 50/50 it for b/c since answers were so similar. also with 13d, im probably wrong and so are others from my school but everyone ended up getting 36/25pi. forgot what the question is (something related to hemispherical bath). Thanks.
now i put my 2024 cssa advanced solutions here: https://4unitmaths.com/cssa-2024-a-sol-tywebb.pdf
they took 32 pages to do it and i did it in 4
they took 32 pages to do it and i did it in 4
Although most of my solutions for advanced are shorter than cssa's I nevertheless sometimes went the other way - for example I spent half a page showing working for the MC and cssa didn't bother with the working for MC. They did in ext 1 and ext 2, but not for advanced.
I think if solutions don't just assist marking but also will be used in the future for revision, then it is better to show working
I think if solutions don't just assist marking but also will be used in the future for revision, then it is better to show working
anyway here is another version of solutions this time in video format and it is for all the cssa maths in 2024: https://sites.google.com/parra.catholic.edu.au/2024-cssa-mathematics-trial-so/home
but i looked at the ext. 1 12c video and he said something ridiculous. He said the question said fired from the wall in part ii but meant fired from tower.
well dude it didn’t say fired from tower it said fired from wall!
my solutions are consistent with what the question actually said not what they meant to say but didn’t. so i’m still not changing mine.
but i looked at the ext. 1 12c video and he said something ridiculous. He said the question said fired from the wall in part ii but meant fired from tower.
well dude it didn’t say fired from tower it said fired from wall!
my solutions are consistent with what the question actually said not what they meant to say but didn’t. so i’m still not changing mine.
Last edited:
jonolad69
Well-Known Member
is this your website tywebb
btw you can get similar videos for 2022 and 2023 ones here
https://sites.google.com/parra.catholic.edu.au/2022-cssa-mathematics-trial-so/home
https://sites.google.com/parra.catholic.edu.au/2023-cssa-mathematics-trial-so/home
haven’t watched them but i hope he doesn’t say stupid things like he said about 2024 ext 1 q12cii - like question said something but meant something else - so you’ve got to do what? write a solution for a completely different question that wasn’t on the paper?
https://sites.google.com/parra.catholic.edu.au/2022-cssa-mathematics-trial-so/home
https://sites.google.com/parra.catholic.edu.au/2023-cssa-mathematics-trial-so/home
haven’t watched them but i hope he doesn’t say stupid things like he said about 2024 ext 1 q12cii - like question said something but meant something else - so you’ve got to do what? write a solution for a completely different question that wasn’t on the paper?
Last edited:
WeiWeiMan
Well-Known Member
the vectors visualising for mcq10 is legit useless
you're basically figuring out the number of ways you can arrange m right moves and n up moves
this is basically just arranging m R's and n U's in a straight line
this can be done 2 ways:
first way: (m+n)!/m!n!, where (m+n) is the total number of letters and n! and m! account for the double ups
second way: choose m R's from m+n U's and R's, so m+n C m = (m+n)!/m!n!
hence C
Average Boreduser
Rising Renewal
lowkey gotta love when you pull nearly all of 14 and lose majority of your marks in the q11 
I shouldve 95ed this shit if I just stayed focused and used my time wisely. Word of advice to students doing 3u accelerated, remember to balance all your subjects out. If you continually do maths, it will take a toll on your processing speed+ awareness when you are doing exams. Coming from someone who did exactly that in this test and got hit w a 82
I shouldve 95ed this shit if I just stayed focused and used my time wisely. Word of advice to students doing 3u accelerated, remember to balance all your subjects out. If you continually do maths, it will take a toll on your processing speed+ awareness when you are doing exams. Coming from someone who did exactly that in this test and got hit w a 82 bruhmoment.
Active Member
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2023
- Messages
- 245
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2024
82 still aint that bad brolowkey gotta love when you pull nearly all of 14 and lose majority of your marks in the q11
. i got bummed with a 70. legit aced q14 (somehow got 3/5 for cycloid question) and everything else was fine and did silly mistakes in q13 like ffs.Average Boreduser
Rising Renewal
bruh how did u get 3lmfao. I got 3.5 and I pulled out the 2sin^2(x/2) wtf82 still aint that bad bro