Search results

yes i said pH adjustment is first because the text book said so! as it increases precipitation

Hi 5 :)

Thats what I said, because the pH encourages precipitation

Hey guys I was wondering if carried error applies? since I got the first equations wrong in the last question, does that mean I lose all 7 since my working out builds on a? Thanks

I think I got 15 B, and 1.78% nitrogen, 0.9 grams for the ethanol combustion, anyone else?

I got 1.78%

I think I got like 7/15, how about everyone?

I didn't really like the exam much as I didn't emphasise much on some of the questions, like stuff about koch and pasteur and B and T cells were not really tested,, inherited and other diseases were not either,, hated how it focused on the other stuff

I put Hypothalamous?

I confused the medulla and cortex and put them the wrong way around I think,,, dunno if they will be mean and take a mark off,,, I hated the drawings, so much drawing and I felt like writing in big letters that I CAN'T FREAKEN DRAW, thats why I never took up art...

Yeh I rushed that question but thats what I talked about, the action potential I said that a minimum threshold must be reached and that increasing the stimulus intensity has not much effect on how much the action potential goes, etc... did anyone else hate the drawings?! omg I kept on trying to...

Re: What will be this years band 6 be for bio It was a fair test I think, like any previous bio exam,, multiple choice were harder, but still doable... I think it will be the same as previous years

kk coolios... Thanks man

I made a silly error where I put the first 2 parts of question 6 into the back of question 5... Now I asked the examiners and the head examiner told me to just leave a side note on the front of question 6 telling them where the first 2 parts were, but then I started thinking what if each...

Oh crap!!!! oh well lost a mark

weren't they trying to trick you with the wording? wasn't it l=rtheta? and that would be the perimeter of AB?

Re: Would this be enough for a band 5? nah 01 and 03 papers were not that bad, I mean it was only question 10's... there were some weird questions in this paper, I was thinking of grinding through the first 8 then do 9 to make up for my mistakes and try 10a, but my whole planned was ruined...

uhh man,, 9b all of it, 7bii and iii, 6c i and ii, 4(isoceles one and the ratio; didnt click at all), 10 the last part

Re: Band 6 Raw? man I think this paper was freaken hard,, 2003 paper was easier, because there was a sort of a pattern that it followed with the previous ones, this one was so over the place, I had the biggest headache trying to answer them, Got stuck at question 4, didn't have time to do...

man I think I'm gonna get like 70% in this test and i did the 1999 paper yesterday and got 84%,, what the heck, so unfair!