Search results

If God created an absolute moral construct for us to follow, then why does this not apply to God himself?

I was saying that there seems to be double standards. When god murders in the OT it's merciful and noble but when a human murders it's immoral. If humans were created in God's image doesn't this present an inherent contradiction in our 'absolute' moral construct?

So I can justify muder by saying that they will be recived by God and have a better life? I don't think that argument would hold up in court

Apparantly this is still justification for a perfect moral being that we all should worship

Cheers for the rep man!

"But buttsecks makes kittens cry..." I believe this sums up religious intolorence of homosexuality but tolerance of homsexuals

Pascal's wager, seriously? I'll let Christopher Hitchens field this question YouTube - Christopher Hitchens: Pascal's wager = religious hucksterism

So after a minimum of 96,000 years of human civilisation , God decides to intervene and define our moral construct to a small village in Jerusalem. Seems fair to me... I wonder how we survived as a species before being told what was right and what was wrong - I don't think we could have worked...

Someone still hasn't learnt the difference between correlation and cause.

Morally perfect as defined to himself?

I see no concrete evidence at all. I spent my entire life as a christian until last year so you can get off your high horse about me not looking into it. I maintain my stance as an agnostic because I see no rational reason to be either a theist or an atheist. And I'm not going to subscrice to...

To bring an innocent child into indoctrinated religion, promoting the surrender of reason and, belief without evidence as an acceptable way of life is sickening to me to be quite honest.

Once you can provide rational reasons for how homosexual marriage is going to affect you as an individual, only then will I consider your nonsense about "defending the status quo". Please enlighten me on how something that has no effect on the parts has some major effect on the whole. wtf??

Doesn't that depend on what you imply perfect to mean?

Orphans don't deserve loving parents apparantly. God made them orphans for a reason

Is this where you say that Leviticus doesn't apply to the modern world but insist that the rest of the bible does?

And that is exactly was I was saying to you?

I don't really want to bring out the "Lol Leviticus" card again but it seems to answer your own question.

Because creationists are usually that stupid