Search results

What economic benefits? Explain how shifting businesses to regional areas provides a net benefit. If anything it is less efficient environmentally to have large amounts of people living sparsely populated regional areas as they will have to travel more. Even with a HSR rail corridor, many more...

I'm with you! What do we do next?

Hahaha yeah because high income earners just lock their piles of cash away in vaults. Even based on your own basic, textbook, neoclassical economic theory, what you have said is completely wrong. Savings = Investment. Money that is saved is still spent on capital goods, and labor for...

well said

the trolls are trolling each other now?

No.

unfit /= chubby you can be skinny and unfit. for girls, as long as they're not fat, face is most important.

"Man does not ravish every female that stirs his senses; he does not devour every piece of food that entices him; he does not knock down every fellow he would like to kill. He arranges his wishes and desires into a scale, he chooses; in short, he acts. What distinguishes man from beasts is...

This guy doesn't seem like a troll, I guess its the name and the pic, it seems like its actually some stupid azn. Anyway, added to ignore list.

The idea is that we control our most base instincts in pursuit of something better, rather than institutionalizing ape like tribalism.

i don't give a fuck: when taxes are cut drastically, and we stop imprisoning and murdering people for NO REASON, it might be worth considering. Maybe.

Definitely. It's a no brainier.

rail = nice and green and cool because they have it EUROPE planes = dirty, bad, old technology. just like; nuclear = evil, and will lead to mutated FUTURE GENERATIONS no actual analysis of the impacts is required. High speed rail would be cool okay. They have it in the most densely populated...

Read the article you stupid motherfucker. The cost benefit analysis is based on the assumption that people switch from road and air travel, and it incorporates those benefits into the analysis.

Yep, that's how competition works. You compete for customers by being MORE EXPENSIVE.

John Stossel isn't an academic and he appears on FOX NEWS. Therefore, the opposite of what he says must be true. Thus PROVING that public healthcare is good.

Why don't we just hand our guns to Obama now and give the foreign bankers ABSOLUTE POWER!

yes, everyone looks at porn no, no one cares except old people and massive christfags who still look at porn, but feel guilty about it.

Good compared to what? Here are some people that might not consider it so good: -Those that die in emergency rooms waiting for treatment. -Those that die while on waiting lists for emergency treatments. -People denied access to drugs like marijuana for medicinal use and forced to use more...

Money is just a measure of resources, primarily the labor of top scientists. Throwing pieces of paper at a problem won't solve it, but allocating millions of hours to research and development often does.