Search results

all good bby u got this!

if the question is on youth offenders? id steer away from using the same case but u could try to put the argument of age + children's court in one para

generally theyd specify if they want international, if they say just courts then assume domestic, which includes youth koori + drug court : )

yep that's okay too! ppl have gotten 15/15 with 2 paras, u got thisss

ur gonna walk in there with a fat headache, half asleep, nauseous asf.

for the crime essay, before going in i aimed for 3-4 paragraphs, stick with a minimum of 3! these paragraphs are just 3 topics. u can use a lot of evidence within these paragraphs but if u have too many topics and concepts then the reader finds it hard to follow what ur talking abt, u lose sight...

honestly they've been predicting credit for like the past 5 yrs but nothing, still worth going over. also im not sure if uve already been told but plsss define as much as u can. literally define what a consumer is, whats a business, what is credit, whats debt, these marks are easy marks!! this...

nooo its okay u still have a couple of hrs, ur gonna regret pulling an all nighter

just looked at my paper: i also talked about CTP with charge negotiations --> not only encourages cooperation bw offender and court but also reduces amt of resources spent on court procedures by reducing likelihood of prolonging the case, example is R v. Taiseni. but counter argument is that...

i bought my paper back so ill try to find it and send it but im pretty sure i talked about judicial discretion in courts thru mitigating factors that encourages the offender to comply with the police/judicial personnel (kinda like if u cooperate ill try to take into account ur circumstances)...

same criteria for options : ) at least for me i kept it the sm

OMG CONGRATS GUYS UR ALL DONE!!! 💗💗💗

Yall spam the nesa mcq questions for HR and crime I promise ull be fine 😭

my recommendation is to define all the terms of the question first so u tick off the low band marks straightaway. like if a question asks abt the effect of empiricism u wouldn't just jump right into it, ud define it and outline its origins. also include as many examples as u can! even if they're...

LMAOOO HELP THIS IS BEING TAKEN SERIOUSLY??? idc if u don't think that harris' and trump's crimes are on the same scale bc u could literally argue the opposite w/ the amt of war crimes harris has contributed to (and so has trump!). and yes if it came to it i wouldn't vote for either of them, id...

I think u can apply it to anything! young offenders, legal aid, diversionary programs, etc 😍 If u get a cjs question like this ull be luckyyyy 🙏

U can use judicial discretion in CTP, community interest of holding offender accountable clashes with individual freedom of fair trial and taking into consideration mitigating factors. So community wants to see offender go to jail but offender wants the least jail time possible.

the external is quite hard, ull be lucky to finish the exam tbh. ppl think its not that many questions but each question has specific parts to it, stimuli to analyse, etc. i remember my peers didn't even finish the last question.

they're both bad candidates. whats your point.

jokes on u i was the prof who marked her presentation and she quite literally aced it. 100/100.