Search results

You've just proven my point. Sharia and the aust judicial system are 2 different concepts and arent in line with each other.

thank u, wtf is jin?

The Qur'an legislates the death penalty for murder, although forgiveness and compassion are strongly encouraged. The murder victim's family is given a choice to either insist on the death penalty, or to pardon the perpetrator and accept monetary compensation for their loss (2:178). The Prophet...

R u reffering to my school?

WTH?

Okay, yep. Lets get this straight. From what im aware of, this applies excusively to man slaughter. And the decision of whether the killer is to pay a compensation, or have his life taken, lies in the hands of the relatives of the one killed. "O ye who believe! the law of equality is...

You're still making no sense. The charity option is only possible in certain situations. If u were to kill someone today with intent, and found guilty, you would be killed according to sharia law, and no u cant give a compensation or another form of charity. That what Islam is."An eye for an...

Sharia is completely different. It has specific punishments for different offences, and proving someone guilty is also quite different. Eg- adultery according to sharia is a crime and if someone was to be found guilty they would be stoned to death. Now u cant possibly say this runs parallel...

"US, Australia etc. have laws pretty much in line with these views as well." I disagree with you here. The judicial system that we have in Australia is extremely different from sharia, and i think many would agree to this.

In general, for those who think sharia is a failure, i think not. However still my heart doesn't go with what hizb-ut-tahrir fights for

Tbh, there are several muslims that are against Hiz-but-tahrir. The group has been banned in muslim countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan, and im suprised this group is still running in australia, and england. Just before i get attacked here, i dont agree nor disagree with the agendas they pursue.

You dont see the irony in people like u who are attacking those who are holding placards?

+ 1 This is what im trying to get across

I think what pakiprince is refferng to is this - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blkYf_ngFSk

I do condemn the violence, however i don't see why people cant hold such placards, isn't this "their freedom of speech" , under which the production of the movie is justified?

Them calling for beheadings, is that also fredom of speech???

Why cause his attacking christians. Go have a cry looser

HAAAH lol

No its isn't freedom. His broken the American law, if u had only read my previous post

"Under the narrower guidelines, only speech that has the intent and the likelihood of inciting imminent violence or lawbreaking can be limited."- now don't tell me that the film didnt intend to bring about violence. Why would the producers send the film to the media in arab nations, as this...