Search results

hmm thanks guys. I've got another question! :D Which would be better for law, macq or uts? Would there be much of a dif? Last year I think UTS was about 97.5 while mac was 95 or something..

fuck.

Keep it up unless there are serious legal implications; your argument was relatively balanced, I'd personally keep it up. Get rid of the part which insulted the particular teacher and according to their criteria you should be fine o.O. But I reckon, contrary to mills, they'll threaten legal...

Yeah sorry if this is the wrong part of the forums, I've never really been able to place where to put these questions. Basically, I can't decide whether I should be going for a law course at a lower tier uni (it'd be macquarie) or trying and failing to get into sydney or NSW instead and hence...

90 or bit below

Tiny classes don't mean jack shit. The subjects, however, do suggest a poorer rank, something you fail to point out. Failtroll.

wrong

estimating on those low-mid 90s. Yeah maths needs work

Nice trolling... Fuck man, I really try hard not to neg rep you, but you're not making it easy

Every thread these days turns into some irrelevant argument. Modern I would kill myself if I did not get a band 6 in. English and maths I think I will too, legal and eco hopefully for each I'll scrape it to 90. EE1 no way in hell, EH1 possibly though I have my doubts.

Teachers marking generously across all subjects in a school of that high rank is unlikely. And those marks are awesome. Cohort ain't THAT small. So I personally can't see why wouldn't be 99

yeah those calcs are only good if you know how all your subjects align...And for almost every combination we really have very little idea of how things align, so really, they're actually quite useless until your marks come out the day before you get your ATAR

80+, and if you're a failure what does that make that 75% of people in your school you're beating?

OH that was at OP... But you've got good ranks...97.5 would be feasible for you, but I'd say more up to 95

Re: Dear Malcolm Turnbull: Take on Krudd or move aside and let someone else do the jo lol I didn't read this properly. COMMUNIST? Are you INSANE? Rudd must be the most conservative labour PM in a long time, if not ever. Surely you must acknowledge therefore a lack of left thinking

Re: Dear Malcolm Turnbull: Take on Krudd or move aside and let someone else do the jo he's the most liberal of the ironically-named liberals, and I think he's the only real chance at leader. He's intelligent, charismatic and exercises reasonably good policies in comparison to his liberal...

Re: what do u look for in a bf/gf? No direct jabs, my views might offend people though. THey weren't cheap though, see? Many people were trolling.

Re: what do u look for in a bf/gf? Trollfest much? Someone who's nice, cute, intelligent and would be financially stable. I wouldn't wanna date any gold digger. See? My own criteria weren't hard to give, and I didn't make any cheap jabs at other people.

Heheh, that's clever, using science to amaze people into believing in God. Can't people accept a fucking coincidence or two? Exactly the reason why we doubt there is no life out there is because the CHANCES of earth forming are tiny. But this doesn't necessarily mean that it's not possible. One...

fuck being scared it won't affect your final score so why bother thinking about it beforehand? Deal with issues as they arise, and don't waste time contemplating on em when everything is speculative.