Search results

The Law FAQ also has a detailed transfer section.

Semester 1: Administrative Law Litigation 1 Law, Lawyers and Society Legal Theory Semester 2: Federal Constitutional Law Litigation 2 Business Associations 1 Advanced Legal Research

Guys, honestly. Come on. Don't you two realise.... that you're in love with each other?

Ah, apologies PwarYuex, I interpreted your "you don't have to do anything" as a legal contention about the rights of consumers and businesses, but you were really making a practical, normative claim. I agree that certainly large department stores will always bow down to the customer. Many a...

Not really - the TPA (s52, misleading and deceptive conduct), estoppel & misrepresentation will all nail you to the edge of a cliff by your tongue if you do that.

I never said there was no such thing as a creation.

Behold HotShot, our resident solipsist.

There is an implied warranty of both fitness for purpose and merchantable quality implied by statute into every consumer sale. You cannot contract out of these warranties and any term of a contract that seeks to do so is void. However, you have not breached either one. Firstly there is an...

I disagree. The elements of maths always existed, just not the discipline or the study of maths. Long before humans existed, 2+2 still equaled 4 (2 being a certain quantity and 4 being two times that quantity). We didn't "invent" this rule. It can be translated into whatever language you...

I've said it before and I'll say it again: other people's notes really are inadequate. The only use of group work for study is the actual sitting down and going through the work with each other. Using each other's notes is very limited as: (1) You did not compile them yourself, so you do not...

Hmm I started reading my BA book - was going through partnership, but as you know I have had timetable woes and so I'm doing it second semester. So I will have to be uninformed for a while :(

Been reading up for FedCon? When the case begins, I will be reading the High Court transcript with great interest. It should prove an interesting start for the new judge, Justice Crennan.

Did you even read my post? Perhaps you did not understand it. I explained to you why you have to prove it. I stated that you are making a fallacious shift of the burden of proof. The person who argues for the more surprising, counter-intuitive claim carries the burden of proof. It is up to...

I personally liked it. Sometimes the feeling a film produces in the viewer can be more important than any plot or meaningful structure. I mean, if you think about it nothing much happens. But the film is stirring, and in particular placing it in Japan gave it a real absurd feel that I found both...

Hehe. Godel's argument is a modal version of the ontological argument. There are numerous modern versions of the modal ontological argument. I described one that I liked some time ago:

"Quran the word of God" What you have attempted to do is to fallaciously shift the burden of proof. The onus is not on us to prove that the Quran is not the word of God. The onus is on you to prove that it is the word of God. It is like saying "I believe that you are an alien in very...

Haha! That is hilarious

I'm sorry, how has it been proven that the Quran was written by God? ^ I have no idea what you are talking about here

It's not being banned. The use of the word "banned" in this context is just an emotive expression by the media. There is currently no flag. They were looking at putting one up. They decided not to, a long period before the Cronulla violence, for economic reasons.

To throw at burglars?