Search results

With respect, I already disposed of that argument in another thread: It is a very old argument and comes in a few different forms but they all suffer the core flaws similar to what I have pointed out above. That is an empty sentence. Faith is just believing in something without logical or...

I will answer a few arguments that are half-way attempted -- 1. That is very bad logic. Simply because we do not understand something does not call for the adoption of a fantastical belief that does not actually explain anything at all. This is your argument: 1. There are things that...

As NTB said, just because you can't explain something doesn't mean there is a God behind it. That is the reason people in medieval times invented deities to explain sheep dying in the night or other unexplained phenomenon. If there was a volcano or an earthquake then "the Gods must be angry"...

1. Smile 2. Be calm but confident 3. Be friendly 4. Be enthusiastic. You're a smarty if you're doing psych/law so I wouldn't worry about any curve-balls they throw at you. Mention you like (a) problem solving and (b) helping people. Show interest in the specific types of things you'll be...

I see. So your argument is: 1. Stuff exists. 2. Therefore, God exists. Very convincing! And please do not say that "faith" is evidence. Faith means belief in something without evidence.

While you call believing in something that spectacular without evidence "special" (which is completely vague and doesn't show anything), I call it irrational.

It might run but it will be TERRIBLE. I have a P4 2.8ghz, 512mb RAM, 128 vid and I still don't put every setting on max.

More humour from John Clarke & Brian Dawe -- http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200510/r62507_172374.asx

It took ~1.5 hours to make and set up. Then whenever I find a quote I just shove it in (< 1 minute to publish a post). I don't go actively searching for quotes!

1. We are not 4 year olds, and the article was not aimed at children. Adults/young adults should be well informed on such significant matters. 2. We are not simply "fighting", we are discussing this issue. That is the point of this forum. We are not sitting around holding hands chanting...

well I actually made a site to archive high court humour: http://members.iinet.net.au/~cgmhome/interalia/

Purple relates to royalty! I suppose sexually frustrated royalty hehe

Sadly true :( Plus I also have 2 essays impending -- merriment must be postponed I'm afraid..

But how so?

The people who complain about law are typically those who aren't too good at it -- whether it is because they aren't interested and thus aren't as motivated or because their natural talents are not as well suited to the field. If you don't like it, best to find another area of study. Leave law...

Mathmite perhaps you can use " :rolleyes: " to indicate sarcasm because... frankly I can't tell anymore

Thanks :cool: PS. Mathmite I daresay we are all leftys in relation to you... and I prefer bourban/scotch/red wine thanks :P

A warning: Having played (& finished) the full version (and being big on RTS), it gets surprisingly boring after a while.

<3 Say no to com/law automatons! :chainsaw: (Note that is the 80% of com/law people who are robots, not com/law people all of whom are robots.)

This thread had been done before, so I've merged them