Search results

hurlstone chemistry 2024: https://community.boredofstudies.org/resources/hurlstone-chemistry-2024-trial.20610/ added to post #4

Hurlstone Chemistry 2024 trial

notice contrapositive is still in the syllabus consider the following seemingly innocuous statement which would not get you banned on social media: if euler's formula should be in the syllabus then the students are not stupid this may elicit responses such as thank you for that insightful...

What's Next: The Future with Bill Gates, episode 1: What will AI do for us/to us?

in the draft syllabus euler's formula was still there, but the syllabus which was released a few days ago here https://curriculum.nsw.edu.au/learning-areas/mathematics/mathematics-extension-2-11-12-2024/overview surprised everyone with the removal of euler's formula. nesa gave no indication...

Rose Bay Secondary College 2024 Physics trial was here before but got deleted because some parts of it came from neap

2024 hsc exams will go here https://educationstandards.nsw.edu.au/wps/portal/nesa/resource-finder/hsc-exam-papers/2024 nothing there yet obviously but they tend to go there a short while after each exam

There could be a simpler explanation rather than the "better wait til uni"-type elitism. maybe they just wanted to reduce content, so thought well what if we remove euler's formula, that won't cause too much damage will it? one less thing to do, and although it causes a slight amount of damage...

“its use case was not much different from cos x + i sin x” is also completely wrong how about multiplying and dividing complex numbers much more easily proving de Moivre’s theorem in 1 line proving compound angle formulae more easily finding roots of complex numbers in a much more elegant way

there are files for advanced and extension 1 too here https://www.ringomok.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/2026_adv_syllabus_comments.pdf https://www.ringomok.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/2026_ext1_syllabus_comments.pdf don’t know if he make one for standard, but i think the steve howard one...

nothing from nesa says anything about it. however this was posted recently “The rationale for this is that its use case was not much different from cos x + i sin x anyway, but rather it created some problems whereby students (and teachers alike) naively misunderstood the behaviour of complex...

even before the hsc started in 1966, in leaving certificate, i have a Coroneos book even older called "A Leaving Certificate Mathematics I Honours Course", 1963 in which he had these 2 questions, and for those lucky enough to have this book, it is on pages 165, 173

So will textbooks remove it? Maybe. However consider this, even though the old syllabus didn't have it, in post #222 the eagle-eyed would notice Coroneos' 1966 book had it anyway: so it's kind of been around since the beginning, so some textbooks may decide to keep it in regardless.

this was in the draft and there was no indication it would be deleted - most people assumed this would remain because the current syllabus and the draft is an improvement on the previous syllabus because in the old one it wasn't there nesa have a page on the new syllabus at...

apparently euler’s formula has been deleted from the extension 2 do you think that’s a good move, or do you think it is a backward step?

yeah it’s one of these: https://4unitmaths.com/5-s2-2024.zip there are 4 more there too there is a thread for 2024 trials here: https://community.boredofstudies.org/threads/2024-trials.410168/ and i don’t know if more will go there for standard later but they might

zeta mathematics extension 1 2024 trial: https://community.boredofstudies.org/resources/zeta-mathematics-extension-1-trial-2024.20605/ added to post #1

zeta mathematics extension 1 trial 2024

here is the 1926 paper: https://community.boredofstudies.org/resources/1926-leaving-certificate-mathematics-honours-i-paper.20604/ one thing you may notice back in those days the examiners put their names on the papers: do you think they should put their names on the hsc exams? actually they...

1926 Leaving Certificate Mathematics Honours I paper i put 1987 for year because it wouldn't let me go back to 1926 it has some questions relevant to mathematics extension 2