Also, if you were keen on the old liberal studies degree, consider arts/science. It's being changed to 4 years instead of 5, so it's pretty similar to liberal studies
What about engineering makes you want to do it? Sounds like you don't have any real interest in it, and you're just picking it because you didn't make med. Maybe also consider med science or other health related courses
i thought it was only 5%?
that was really annoying trying to do the intro with the 2 different theories. mine really isn't in the format its supposed to be in. oh well
i only did like 350 for intro. my methods 400 though, will need to cut that down. on about 900 so far and about to start the discussion. pretty sure i'll have to cut at least 100 from method/results
If you overload 1 subject per semester, you'll do 20 subjects in 2 years. You'll do 16 if you don't overload. So doing 2 each summer would get you the degree in 2 years. Though I really don't see why you'd be in such a rush
yeah method section is really easy to do fast, cause its just basically saying what's in the debrief.
i briefly mentioned 6 studies, but my intro is crap
But that's completely pointless. As I said in my post, most people in that situation will just vote in a way that will add randomness to the outcome, which can hardly be seen as a desirable result
I have to agree with Pwar's view
Not meaning to be nit-picky, but I don't think many historians use a deductive method tbh. Generally historical explanations are abductive.