Search results

oh and ive been hearing that howard also introduced this policy. surely, it wasnt as outrageous as this right?

it saddens me to think that by the next election, the whole population will have forgotten this stupid farce and vote rudd in again.

QFT

wow, 10 mins, thats quite impressive

i think most from my grade went well. it was considerably easier than 4u thats for sho

thats what i did, but sometimes i worry its not enough working

ouch. 9marks is quite a lot for him

lol, and who would this guy be? im guessing jason tam -_-

i dont think so. it was pretty straight forward. its quite obvious the derivative of sin is cos

you go to baulko right? 9 marks from just stupid mistakes or 9 altogether?

omg you're making me nervous. which question needed degrees?

would i have lost marks for not showing adequate working? i just did it in my head and went straight to (sin^3)/3

definately 2/3

i cant beleive i fucking got that wrong. i looked at it as ln(x-3)(x-5). so i said x> 5. but i drew the graph. is there any chance that i might get 1 mark?

its 12:44. i almost put 12:45 as well, but i realised my answer was in decimals not degrees and minutes

Re: How did you guys go? comon, as if this binomial question wasnt easier then the previous ones. i remember there was one where you had to integrate three times and substitute x=0, x=-1 and x=1. that was a hard binomial question

thats what i thought, but then the equation of the parabola would be y= -ax(x-r). and i couldnt think of a way to get rid of a.

Re: How did you guys go? im quite surprised they gave us such an easy binomial question. when i first looked at it i skipped it, thinking iit would be as hard as the previous years. came back, and was like, wtf, so easy

what's wrong with radian mode?

8!/2 ( as john behind barabara is half of all cases. easy i know, but i didnt think of it in the exam)