Search results

It was like $2150 wasn't it? The answer I got was a bit off.

I think i'll get Band 6 hopefully.

The question was difference between two dice, not what the value of the dice was.

Yea, my answer was 0.2 x 10^-7 But i have this feeling I wrote -6.

Maybe they mixed up, 50mg = 0.5g right? Ah shit, its 0.05 :( Also, for Question 25C, they said 1m^3 =1000L, but it's wrong? 1 (meter^3) = 1000 litre

Wait it was 2x10^-6 or something.

I got exactly that :) I did it via tree-diagram as well. 25.b microbes, i got something like 1 x 10 ^ -7

I didn't find it that much of a problem. Although I did miss out on the ONE related text for AOS :(

Commerce at USYD* might have a better reputation in the industry, along with the Uni in general. Although i dont know about IT. Bsc in IT at UTS is NOT a scholarship course, only the B IT course is.

Witness was a messed up question.

You don't have unlimited time in real life. Although i must agree that English really needs a time extension, other subjects can be completed before the time is over but the humanities and English subjects are REALLY time oriented, everyone just rushes the hell out of the paper.

What I don't get is that the Rubrics, Marking Guidelines, Standards Packages AND the Marking Notes don't seem to refer to techniques at all.

Standards packages doesn't seem to use it. Standards Packages :: Sample 2 Weird, I have this ingrained thought to use techniques.

I just read a past papers marking notes. Do we need to use Techniques for this at all? i know that we need to link techniques in Module A and B for sure, but Module C seems to be just textual references and a strong thesis. Is that right or am i wrong? Obviously if they ask HOW then you...

I was supposed to do that. I woke up at 12:30 though LOL Almost missed my exam too =\ 2 page essay oh lord

Do some research on the actual course content and what uni you prefer. Science in IT is a normal IT course, the one without science is a scholarship. It's hard to argue that Sydney is better then UTS at business since they take different approaches, also it's not like UTS SPECIALISE in IT...

If only everyone was like that.

Section 1 - My answers were vague and waffle. Section 2 - My story left out a load of stuff, and made little sense. Section 3 - My argument was weak, and I rushed it.

So do they really mark easier in the HSC or is that just a load of BS. Seriously, I did worse then what I thought I would do and my practices have been coming out with 11's and 12's, think thats still possible? lol..

The server actually died last year? lol