Search results

quite obviously yes i read "minimum" instead of "maximum"

i'm down to 95 now, didn't read q14bii all hopes and dreams are shattered

knocked back down to 95 after not reading q14bii

prediction: no probability

i wrote 0, pi, 2pi, etc.

well i WAS happy but i just found another 3 marks lost from silly errors. i'm sitting on i think about 95 now. lost 2 in MC, accidentally found the minimum value of fi instead of maximum, and made 1 silly mistake in q11 integral (somehow got - the answer)

just realised i also found theta for when fi was a minimum rather than maximum, gg lost 2 marks that puts me on 95 tears are flowing

found another silly in q11 NOOOOOOOO down to 97

what a waste of time

i think the start was harder but end was easier. i feel like the e4 might be a little lower, but the top end will be "sandwiched" together because last q was fairly simple

probs only 10 got over 97, i doubt i got 98, i lost both those marks in MC LOL

96-97

yup

i have never been this proud before

i didn't know what to call it i just said 0 </= (insert expression) </= 0 therefore -> 0

i don't see why that seems shifty :S it said prove it's increasing for (/) between -pi/2 and pi/2 so differentiate and show > 0 for the given domain. pretty straight forward?

q1. D q2. A q3. B q4. C q5. C q6. D q7. B q8. B q9. A q10.d

i've made 2 sillies so far, so 100% is definitely possible. i would be surprised if nobody got 100

lost 2 in MC now gg

pretty much