Search results

the liberal democratic party would legalise masturbation and voluntary servitude

with allah's (swt) praise, surely the muslims should win

lolz thats gonna be so sweet bruh vote liberal democratic party if you have a penchant for freedom and good times

vote liberal democratic party if you think freedom is tops

vote liberal democratic party if you love freedom

i always have a good time on meth

neither the study nor the Nutt article they cite define solvents. also, Nutt (2007) seems to distinguish alkyl nitrates (poppers) from inhaled solvents. so i can only assume inhaled solvents refers to mostly petroleum products, and i would have imagined their harm factor would be much higher.

what are your thoughts on the methodology? it's self-reported and purely qualitative, so imho it's not the kind of study that could really shake the foundations of the discourse on drug illegality/classification. on the other hand, it is solid evidence of expert experience and opinion.

read the report bro Design Structured questionnaire with nine scored categories of harm for 19 different commonly used substances. ... Addiction specialists and psychiatrists working with substance misuse across Scotland were approached to complete the questionnaire, on the basis of their...

no, that's cannabis. i wanna know about weed

and yet, besides the status of cannabis, nothing is going to change i also wonder how the scoring is affected by the poor quality of illicit (e.g. snorting binding agents, no more rat poison/PMMA/speed in your ecstasy, levamisole in your cocaine)

building new venues every 4 years is beyond idiotic though

touché

if the government stopped footing the bill, the sports would probably merge and pool their resources to survive. i'm talking BMX skeet shooting, synchronised water badminton, so on and so forth

the liberal party is pro-scub

sryinsa make me so agrny this is a travertsy

ms gillard, tear down this wall

under most definitions (e.g. weberian) a technocrat is a bureaucrat, and a technocratic rule would be a bureaucratic rule and i'm sorry but the treasurer is not allowed in the war room

lord liverpool was a public servant the second french republic was run by public servants hitler was a public servant stalin was a public servant pol pot was a public servant nero was a public servant dick cheney was a public servant the public service literally has nothing to do with anything...

edmund barton had some wide-scale reforms