Search results

all philosophical and scientific conclusions require priors? oh, what a scholar you are.

we should invade syria and give them democracy discuss

trap sprung

yes, more skulls for the skull throne

i wasn't deliberately misinterpreting you br8. superfluous? maybe. deceitful? not at all. why do people like you think that others are deliberately misinterpreting them, and not consider the ugly alternative?

yes, quite right. subjugating women is serious business and best left to the professionals. tally ho and sally forth, lentern.

see the violence inherent in the system you cant silence the voice of three and a half billion oppressed women

i think you need to read this sentence over again, because you're the one defending the status quo, not me, and thus you, not I, are the desperate little man you think that a man should have no obligation to support an unintended child you think a woman should have an obligation to support an...

straw man has no heart

this is how insidious your beliefs really are you think that a woman should be shackled to her biology and arbitrary social whims, and indentured to the (patriarchal) state. furthermore, at the end of the day she should be thankful for having the right to be treated like cattle, while men...

you think that because a man might not have intended it, its his decision on whether to care for it, but by virtue of having a parasitic clump of cells occupying her womb, a woman has an obligation to care for a child when it manages to claw its way out.

you think men don't have an obligation to provide for their children, but women do disgusting.

It is such a reflection of the male oriented way in which society has been constructed that just because a man squeezed out a little jiz he doesn't have an obligation to the woman he had sex with and the new life he created. For you pigs the woman is just an object, a receptacle for the jiz...

obviously a man being able to veto a woman's decision is a ridiculous idea. i imagine the the right to consultation for a father would be the least intrusive option. however, this would obviously mean that a woman could not have an abortion without telling the father. is that a good thing or...

yes

go on.

i look at it the other way a pregnant woman is holding a man's baby hostage

a man (?) whiteknighting about womens issues (and misrepresenting them)? how very feminist.

i know right???

donny, you're out of your element ok