Search results

Humans are not hermaphrodites, a person is either male or female. The vast majority of people are solely attracted to the opposite sex and it is only through sex between two members of the opposite sex that life can be created. Homosexuality is a deviation from the norm. It is a behaviour, I...

You are neither homosexual or heterosexual, you simply human with desires, some of which may lead to you to do good, others to do evil. What makes you good or bad, straight or gay etc are your actions. Just like I can think constantly about killing someone, but I am not a murderer until I...

Slavery means different things to different people, but yeah I see your point. Forcing someone to work in squalid conditions for little or no payment constitutes a several breach of moral conduct. Other than that, if you're implying that your notion of morality (in this case, that...

No it isn't. Lol ok, so basically anything I say is totally invalid if you don't agree with it? And there is no animal species yet observed which engages in homosexual behaviours as seen in humans. Sure, in some species sporradic cases of homosexual sex have been observed within in a select...

Homosexuality is wrong because it is immoral. Gay marriage and adoption are opposed not only because homosexuality itself is immoral (and gay adoption and marriage simply encourage immoral behavioru) but also because of the various harmful consequences which will befall our society should they...

Well, as far as I can interpret it, the Bible refers to homosexual sex as being the sin. A loving relationship between two people while not sinful per se (well I don't see it as breaking any code), may lead some into having sex, and thus committing a sin. However, if a level of self control...

She should have kept it (virginity) and got a freaking job, and contributed to the economy, not be some rich fat (prob married as well) 60 y.o.'s guy best friend for the night.

But marriage is an exclusively heterosexual affair. Marriage between two heterosexuals is always a good thing (provided its consensual etc ofc). In fact, marriage can lead people away from sin, heterosexuals having sex outside of marriage will no longer be doing so etc. The difference is in...

That somehow, refusing to give into the demands of a misguided and immoral minority, constitutes a breach of their ability to carry out said immorality in the first place.

Defiling marriage for a minority has nothing to do with preventing a person to choose to live a homosexual lifestyle if they so wish... What are you trying to say?

Intolerance is a right. Hahaha... Ok lets just say, a person who willingly commits sin and argues for their right to commit said sin and expects everyone else to tolerate their repulsive behaviors; wouldn't really fit into the workplace culture. Lol its not the point, they are...

The Pope is in the right, and stop misquoting him, or quoting out of context to be more precise. What he wants is the ability for religious institutions to exercise discretion regarding whether or not they will permit homosexual employees. There is nothing wrong with that, and it should be the...

Thats like saying if you are really for democratic relativism, if society pushed to legalise murder (example) then you would be more than happy to (majority permitting) accept the changing of the definition of murder to killing someone without reason - where having a reason acquits you from...

:)

Not true. I have stated the number of religious people in Australia to demonstrate to those who believe that only a negligible percentage of the population actually opposes same-sex marriage. Yes we are... What does this demonstrate? Are you suggesting that because someone's morals are to...

I never said that because plenty of other people think that it is wrong, that that is in fact why it is. The reason why it is wrong is that it is morally repugnant behavior, which has nothing to do with the amount of people who happen to agree with me that it is wrong. If it is the case...

Humans are no better than any other animal (correct me if you think otherwise), as animals we survived. Sure we had high death rates and poor living conditions overall but thats entirely irrelevant, as animals we continued to reproduce and were part of the food chain and natural cycle. If such...

Ok, let me explain. What I meant was by "it means nothing" is that just because a motion is popular it isn't necessarily right (I oppose homosexuality on a moral level, which is on a separate plane to the democratically decided laws of this country). I act within the law, and I expect others to...

But human rights are not essential at all... We got alone fine as a species before them. Why are they necessary? (Seriously question, can you explain from like a biological/scientific point of view?).

For the kazillionth-trillionth time, this demonstrates nothing. Lol democracy means that the government passes laws based on what the people want. It just so happens that many people are in fact religious, and the proportion of the population who holds such views is entitled to some extent...