yeah but just like english you have to do like Shakespeare, film/play, poetry, prose etc
surely they check it quickly at some point idk personally I wouldn't risk it
Ultimately I think it's a safer bet to do 60% unless you have a solid thesis that you're comfortable with arguing or you've practiced doing so in past, like if you have a good argument with only one para on that specific event it's ok (IMO) but equally if you would rather get to the point and...
Oh damn I never do that, I usually do one paragraph on the qn (but that's because I make a strong thesis which I link to throughout, so I think it works... at least I get good marks...)
It's just harder to do a nuanced argument for like occupation like "Whilst occupation was often initially seen as liberation from Allied colonial dominion, Japanese brutality overall detrimentally impacted civilians in SEA, as evidenced by the incidences of guerilla warfare, social issues, etc."...
Yeah I'm pretty confident in anything to do with the course of the conflict, so pearl harbour, early advance, turning points, allied strategy, a-bomb, and defeat, so praying that one of those comes up lmao
Otherwise eh it is what it is