Search results

i think the main trap with that question was the 'account' bit. NCCA, uniting church, all that jazz would be fine, as long as you had reasons for formation. which of course, you could have considered 'creative writing'.

fuckfoot would like to take this opportunity to point out she is a girl and has been masking herself under the cover of androgony for the past twelve or so months. fuckfoot would then like to re-affirm her belief that this is mindless dross and express her frustration that she is now...

fuckfoot skimmed over several pages since fuckfoot's last post. fuckfoot has witnessed discussion on topics ranging from politics to travel, feminism to baked beans. fuckfoot is peeved for wasting so much time on mindless dross.

i think i read, in the markers notes for 2003 A-Range short stories, that "candidates" wrote stuff that was relevant to other subjects. i could be wrong though. someone'll have to check because i feel rather lazy today.

eh, all the sciences are humanities subjects anyway.

they align your marks on your record of achievment. i don't really understand the actual process but it depends on how hard the paper is, what kind of marks everyone gets, etc. your actual mark is the 'raw' and you will never really see that... aligned mark is the one you show your parents.

i agree, there were a lot of easy bits but tehre was the occasional question that just made me think "well eff me". but because a lot of it was based on a vague understanding and common sense, i'd say band 6 is looking competitive.

the seven marker was pure bullshit, doable, but jarring. i didn't do a model either, i think at school we just looked at diagrams so i made up one with pipecleaners... but it wasn't exactly accurate... still i'm just relieved i didn't really have to know the names of any of those fossils.

we should just make up words to scare off the 05ers

i know pejorative... but the rest may as well be german.

wow, you guys were spoon-fed! i never got some fancy acronym-ish thing... metanarrative. i'm sick of elaborate words for simple things.

no, it depends on what sort of tone your using. you need a sort of i'm-in-a-panic-and-i'm-about-to-collide-with-a-truck voice for the first one, and you need a deadpan-i'm-a-bloody-boring-monotone-teacher voice for the second. you just don't have the imagination. (is that another forbidden word...

that could be misconstrued you know. like: No! right wing! turn! or: no right wing. turn. just pointing out how (fragmented) sentences come alive with punctuation.

mine must be a limited edition, it doesn't have a streetsign head. in fact it resembles a regular barbie.

i'd bow down and kiss your feet but i don't have enough dignity left to spare.

:/ but i've just checked, it's under 'edit profile' --> custom user titles maybe you have to be a member for a certain amount of time or something?

i've never heard of anyone using SATC, although i'm not much of a critical-response-writer. i don't think the markers would see it as inappropriate, lots of people do pop culture bits for crit. response. you just have to make it sound sophisticated, introduce intellectual ideas, that sort of...

go to user cp and then edit options i think... or profile

oh, i LIKE that. maybe they'll give you pity marks? or maybe they'll think you're being a smartarse. either way, your response will stand out.

biffle moot