but how could that be worth 7 marks?Originally posted by abdooooo!!!
it could be any of the dot points in the syllabus with a high difficulty level verb.
even if they asked it last year there is no rules saying that they can't ask it again.
they might produce a question on the dot points of process and analyse information crap... which could virtually be anything. for example for the dot point: analyse information from secondary sources such as computer simulations, molecular model kits or multimedia resources to model the polymerisation process
the question in successone is actually worth 6 marks. "justify" is a high difficulty verb, so potentially it could be worth up to 7 marks. but i don't know how someone could come up with 6 valid points about something like that in an exam situation without actually studied it before in a textbook. i can only think of 1 or maybe 2...Originally posted by iambored
but how could that be worth 7 marks?
WHAT??? Where is that in the syllabus??Originally posted by nerdd
or even maybe the whole galvani, davy and volta development in current and all that crap.
haha, i was going to ask as well. i thought it was physicsOriginally posted by braindrainedAsh
WHAT??? Where is that in the syllabus??
same but i found quite a large dot point on the prac side which is on testing the water supply, so it could very likely be that - how u test it, what may cause contamination etc.Originally posted by shadowRRL
just hope there's nothing about the treatment of your local water system supply
i HOPE its the haber processOriginally posted by JUB JUB
i reckon it's gonna be the haber process
so do i, but it has been done in a past hsc so i'm not counting on itOriginally posted by ~TeLEpAtHeTiC~
i HOPE its the haber process
me too.....either the haber process or CFC'sOriginally posted by ~TeLEpAtHeTiC~
i HOPE its the haber process