13) Either by reasoning that the other ones are inaccurate (bad way of doing), or reasoning:
N2 (g) + 2H2 (g) <=> 2NH3 (g) + heat (exothermic)
There are clearly more moles of gas on the R.H.S. Decreasing in pressure, therefore, shifts equilibrium to the left. Since the forward reaction releases heat, the reverse reaction absorbs heat, hence the answer is A, absorbing heat.
22) a) Look at your other thread
22) b) ii) The sulfur reduction policy should lead to lower levels of SO2, as:
S + O2 --> SO2.
SO2 forms acid rain:
SO2 + H2O --> H2SO3
2SO2 + O2 --> 2SO3
SO3 + H2O --> H2SO4
Acid rain reduces pH of water bodies, killing less tolerant aquatic life. It reduces plant growth and even kills some plants. Acid rain also corrodes the protective layer on leaves, making them more vulnerable and less tolerant. Limestone buildings and monuments can also be corroded.
The reduce in SO2 also increases general air quality. Therefore, the sulfur reduction policy will be good for the environment.
27) a) Basically (elaborate on this), use scales to weigh water sample, add AgNO3 in excess to fully precipitate out Cl-, pour the reacted water sample through the sintered glass filter. The residue should be AgCl precipitate. Dry, and weigh. Use this to calculate Cl- concentration.
27) b) Precipitate is 3.65g, => moles AgCl = 0.0255.
AgCl --> Ag+ + Cl- => moles Cl- = 0.0255.
Mass Cl- = 0.903g
This is in 50mL (we assume 50g) of water.
Concentration in ppm = 0.903 / 50 x 1000000ppm
This is 18052.67 ppm