SpiralFlex
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2010
- Messages
- 6,960
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
^Justification of cancelling an r required
Hahahahaha I know that feel bro. So many times..i give up question 9, always end up with some polynomial shit. How the hell did u guys do it O_O
Tommorow I will post a simple but tedious surd question - you should try it.^ and how do i acquire that experience
I blame too much free time ^^Tommorow I will post a simple but tedious surd question - you should try it.
I just realised that for 2012, this is the biggest maths marathon thread. Interesting.
Yay hopefully i can improve from all these questionsTommorow I will post a simple but tedious surd question - you should try it.
I just realised that for 2012, this is the biggest maths marathon thread. Interesting.
So was my working out right^Justification of cancelling an r required
Lol I didn't see it, what was your working?Yay hopefully i can improve from all these questions
So was my working out right
How about if I had this first:^Justification of cancelling an r required
Notice that they are asking for an integral answer. So one in the form of integers. But if we split our isosceles triangle in half, we get two right angled triangles. Each of these sides have an integer side (we can assume height is an integer since the area 12 is an integer, so height must be an integer too). Thus we due to the two triangles are right angled and all have integer sides then we can assume that they are part of a Pythagorean triad. If we test the first triad.i give up question 9, always end up with some polynomial shit. How the hell did u guys do it O_O
No I mean when you cancel a variable in a polynomial equation you need to justify why you cancelled it. For example if we're dealing with length:How about if I had this first:
O_O so theres no other methods to do this unless trial and error?Notice that they are asking for an integral answer. So one in the form of integers. But if we split our isosceles triangle in half, we get two right angled triangles. Each of these sides have an integer side (we can assume height is an integer since the area 12 is an integer, so height must be an integer too). Thus we due to the two triangles are right angled and all have integer sides then we can assume that they are part of a Pythagorean triad. If we test the first triad.
3, 4, 5.
5 is obviously the hypotenuse, so that means the other two sides are going to be 3 and 4.
But hang on, lets take the area of this specific triangle. its (1/2 * 3 *4)*2=12!
But does this triad satisfy our base is 1 more than the two other sides?
Lets try 4 being the bottom, we get 4+4=8 as the length of the base which is NOT 1 more than 5, so that is invalid
But if 3 is the bottom then we get the base as 3+3=6 Which IS 1 more than 5. So that means its valid.
I have probably said this in too many words, my verbosity is very weak lol
I overlooked this bit So that's why going into equations and stuff didn't work so well. Integers integers integer.Notice that they are asking for an integral answer. So one in the form of integers. But if we split our isosceles triangle in half, we get two right angled triangles. Each of these sides have an integer side (we can assume height is an integer since the area 12 is an integer, so height must be an integer too). Thus we due to the two triangles are right angled and all have integer sides then we can assume that they are part of a Pythagorean triad. If we test the first triad.
3, 4, 5.
5 is obviously the hypotenuse, so that means the other two sides are going to be 3 and 4.
But hang on, lets take the area of this specific triangle. its (1/2 * 3 *4)*2=12!
But does this triad satisfy our base is 1 more than the two other sides?
Lets try 4 being the bottom, we get 4+4=8 as the length of the base which is NOT 1 more than 5, so that is invalid
But if 3 is the bottom then we get the base as 3+3=6 Which IS 1 more than 5. So that means its valid.
I have probably said this in too many words, my verbosity is very weak lol
Nah mate, I reckon some questions are appropriate for Year 11. Just keep practicing.I seriously haven't known how to do 1 question in this thread and I'm 2U year 11. Is this some sort of accelerated maths? :/
Why are they so hard? I never did anything like this in year 9 or 10, nothing even close.Nah mate, I reckon some questions are appropriate for Year 11. Just keep practicing.
Oh, I see. Thanks for pointing that out.No I mean when you cancel a variable in a polynomial equation you need to justify why you cancelled it. For example if we're dealing with length:
Just requires deeper thinking than year 10.Why are they so hard? I never did anything like this in year 9 or 10, nothing even close.
What question is this?So far, the petal question and the last two I posted all came from the same year 9 5.3 test.