MedVision ad

A challenge! (1 Viewer)

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Hokay, I just finished doing the hardest 3u induction question I've EVER done.

:-\

Here it is, for the guys who want a challenge. Although the 4u guys should be able to do this with ease, i think.

prove for all positive integral n:
7^n + 3n(7^n) - 1 is divisible by 9

*faints with exhaustion*

if you need help, ask. hehe
*runs off to do some more revision*
 

Estel

Tutor
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
1,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
EDIT: SOLUTION AHEAD, DO NOT READ IF YOU WISH TO ATTEMPT Q


7^n + 3n(7^n) - 1 is divisible by 9

A.
When n=1
LHS = 7^n + 3n(7^n) - 1
= 7 + 21 - 1
= 27, which is divisible by 9.

B.
Suppose that the statement is true for n=k.
That is, suppose that 7^k + 3k(7^k) - 1 = 9m, for some integer m.
We prove the statement is true for n=k+1
That is, we prove 7^(k+1) + 3(k+1)(7^(k+1)) - 1 is divisible by 9.
Now 7^(k+1) + 3(k+1)(7^(k+1)) - 1= (7^(k+1)) (3k+4) - 1
= 7(7^k)(3k+4) - 1
= 7[(7^k)(3k+1) - 1] + 21*7^k + 6
= 63m + 21*7^k + 6*7^k +18k(7^k) - 54m, by the induction hypothesis.
= 9m + 27*7^k +18k(7^k)
= 9[m+3*7^k+2k(7^k)], which is divisible by 9 as required.

C.
It follows from parts A and B by mathematical induction that the statement is true for all positive integers n.
 
Last edited:

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
You could have hidden the answer.

:-\

now people won't attempt to do the question, just look at the solution.
:(

ah well, well done Estel. hehe, I got confused for a while.
 

Estel

Tutor
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
1,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Sorry bout that, edited to warn people not to read if they wish to try the Q.
 

:: ck ::

Actuarial Boy
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
2,414
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
grey council post up sum harder induction q's today is my induction revision day :p !
 

shkspeare

wants 99uai
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
174
1. The cube of the sum of three consecutive integers is divisible by 3

2. The sum of the angles of a polygon of n sides is (2n-4) right angles, n >=2

3. The greatest number of regions that n straight lines can divide a circle is

1/2(n^2 + n + 2), n>=1
 

Estel

Tutor
Joined
Nov 12, 2003
Messages
1,261
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Answers: Do not read ahead if you intend on doing the questions.

1. The cube of the sum of three consecutive integers is divisible by 3
Statement: (n-1)^3+n^3+(n+1)^3 is divisible by 3.

A.
When n=1,
(n-1)^3+n^3+(n+1)^3 = 1^3 + 2^3
= 9, which is divisible by 3.
So the statement is true for n=1.

B.
Suppose that the statement is true for n = k
That is, suppose that (k-1)^3+k^3+(k+1)^3 = 3m, for some integer m.
The proof will be done in two parts.
Firstly, we prove the statement is true for n = k+1
That is, we prove that k^3 + (k+1)^3 + (k+2)^3 is divisible by 3.
k^3 + (k+1)^3 + (k+2)^3
= 3m + (k+2)^3 - (k-1)^3, by the induction hypothesis.
= 3(m+3k^2+9k+3), which is divisible by 3, as required.
Secondly, we prove the statement is true for n = k-1
That is, we prove that (k-2)^3 + (k-1)^3 + k^3 is divisible by 3.
(k-2)^3 + (k-1)^3 + k^3
= 3m + (k-2)^3 - (k+1)^3, by the induction hypothesis.
= 3(m-3k^2+3k-3), which is divisible by 3, as required.

C.
It follows from parts A and B by mathematical induction that the statement is true for all integers n.

Hence, the cube of the sum of three consecutive integers is divisible by 3.



2. Haven't done geometrical induction. :/ Still giving a go to 3...



3. The greatest number of regions that n straight lines can divide a circle is
(n^2 + n + 2)/2, n>=1
A.
When n=1
(n^2 + n + 2)/2 = 4/2
= 2.
So the statement is true for n = 1.
B.
Now the nth line will create n new regions at most if and only if it cuts n lines internally.
So, suppose that the statement is true for n=k.
That is, suppose (k^2 + k + 2)/2 = 1 + 1 + 2 + 3+ ... + k
We prove the statement is true for n=k+1
That is, we prove that ((k+1)^2 + k + 3)/2 = 1 + 1 + 2 + 3+ ... + k + (k+1)
LHS = ((k+1)^2 + k + 3)/2
= (k^2 + k + 2)/2 +1/2 + (2k+1)/2
= 1 + 1 + 2 + 3+ ... + k + (k+1), by the induction hypothesis.
= RHS
C.
It follows from parts A and B by mathematical induction that the statement is true for all positive integers n.
 

shkspeare

wants 99uai
Joined
Jun 11, 2003
Messages
174
thx estel!

still need help with :

2. The sum of the angles of a polygon of n sides is (2n-4) right angles, n >=2

and for the things u posted up grey council (do u go to my school? syd boys)

5. (a) Show that sin x + cos x = sqrt(2) * sin(x + pi / 4)

(b) Show that the derivative of y = e<sup>x</sup>sin x is dy/dx = sqrt(2) * e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + pi / 4)

(c) Given that y = e<sup>x</sup>sin x, use mathematical induction to prove that the nth derivative for positive integral n is given by d<sup>n</sup>y/dx<sup>n</sup> = [sqrt(2)]<sup>n</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + n * pi / 4)

i dont know how to do [c]

6. The Fibonacci sequence is a sequence of numbers defined by the following rules: F<sub>1</sub> = 1, F<sub>2</sub> = 1, and
F<sub>n</sub> = F<sub>n-1</sub> + F<sub>n-2</sub> for integers n > 2.

(a) Write out the first 12 terms of the Fibonacci sequence

(b) Use mathematical induction to prove that F<sub>3k</sub> is even, and that F<sub>4k</sub> is a multiple of 3, for all positive integers k

(c) Hence, or otherwise, prove that F<sub>12k</sub> is divisible by 6, for all integers k > 0


all of 6

8. Prove by induction that, for all positive integers n,
2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>n</sup>) = 2<sup>n+2</sup> - 2(n + 2)


or 8 .. [does this have anything to do with geometric series?]

i have simplified the LHS as n[2(2^n-1)/(n-1)] .. but i cant seem to do the next step..


perhaps CM or anyone similar can give me hints???
 

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
yup, I go to Sydney Boys High.

You would be?

and heh, i'm done with maths for tonight. Will look at tommorow, if CM doesn't help you. You should post up what you got so far for the questions you need help with, cause no point in someone posting up the solution. Better if people see what you've done, and then give you a hint/nudge/correction/whatever.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Estel said:
1. The cube of the sum of three consecutive integers is divisible by 3
Statement: (n-1)^3+n^3+(n+1)^3 is divisible by 3.
Estel, whilst I agree that is probably what the question means, it is not what it says. Your statement is saying the sum of the cubes of three consecutive integers is divisible by three. The question said that the cube of the sum of three consecutive integers is divisible by three, and thus means that:

[n + (n + 1) + (n + 2)]<sup>3</sup> is divisible by 3, where n is an integer

Note to all: Both of these theorems are much easier proved without induction, and you should avoid using induction if it is not mandated by the question.

Proof of originial question:
[n + (n + 1) + (n + 2)]<sup>3</sup> = (3n + 3)<sup>3</sup> = [3(n + 1)]<sup>3</sup> = 27(n + 1)<sup>3</sup>
which is obviously divisible by 3.

Proof of Estel's version:
(n - 1)<sup>3</sup> + n<sup>3</sup> + (n + 1)<sup>3</sup> = (n<sup>3</sup> - 3n<sup>2</sup> + 3n - 1) + n<sup>3</sup> + (n<sup>3</sup> + 3n<sup>2</sup> + 3n + 1) = 3n<sup>3</sup> + 6n = 3n(n<sup>2</sup> + 2)
which is divisible by 3.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
shkspeare said:
2. The sum of the angles of a polygon of n sides is (2n-4) right angles, n >=2
I'm sure this has been discussed before, so do a search, and if you still can't find the answer, come back and I'll try to type it up.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
shkspeare said:
5. (a) Show that sin x + cos x = sqrt(2) * sin(x + &pi; / 4)

(b) Show that the derivative of y = e<sup>x</sup>sin x is dy/dx = sqrt(2) * e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + &pi; / 4)

(c) Given that y = e<sup>x</sup>sin x, use mathematical induction to prove that the nth derivative for positive integral n is given by d<sup>n</sup>y/dx<sup>n</sup> = [sqrt(2)]<sup>n</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + n&pi; / 4)

i dont know how to do (c)
Theorem: If y = e<sup>x</sup>sin x, then d<sup>n</sup>y/dx<sup>n</sup> = [sqrt(2)]<sup>n</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + n&pi; / 4), for all positive integers n.

Proof: By induction on n:

A Put n = 1: LHS = dy/dx
= sqrt(2) * e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + &pi; / 4) by part (b) above
RHS = [sqrt(2)]<sup>1</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + 1 * &pi; / 4)
= sqrt(2) * e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + &pi; / 4)
= LHS

So, the result is true for n = 1.

B Let k be a value of n for which the result is true.
That is, d<sup>k</sup>y/dx<sup>k</sup> = [sqrt(2)]<sup>k</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + k&pi; / 4) _____ (**)

We must now prove the result for n = k + 1.
That is, we must prove d<sup>k+1</sup>y/dx<sup>k+1</sup> = [sqrt(2)]<sup>k+1</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin[x + (k + 1)&pi; / 4]

LHS = d<sup>k+1</sup>y/dx<sup>k+1</sup>
= d/dx[d<sup>k</sup>y/dx<sup>k</sup>]
= d/dx[[sqrt(2)]<sup>k</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin(x + k&pi; / 4)], using the induction hypothesis (**)
= [sqrt(2)]<sup>k</sup> * [sin(x + k&pi; / 4) * e<sup>x</sup> + e<sup>x</sup> * cos(x + k&pi; / 4)] * 1], using the Product Rule
= [sqrt(2)]<sup>k</sup>e<sup>x</sup>[sin(x + k&pi; / 4) + cos(x + k&pi; / 4)]
= [sqrt(2)]<sup>k</sup>e<sup>x</sup> * sqrt(2) * sin[x + (k&pi; / 4) + (&pi; / 4)], using part (a) above
= [sqrt(2)]<sup>k+1</sup>e<sup>x</sup>sin[x + (k + 1)&pi; / 4]
= RHS

So, if the result is true for n = k, then it is also true for n = k + 1.

C It follows from A and B by the process of mathematical induction that the result is true for all integers n &ge; 1
 
Last edited:

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
shkspeare said:
6. The Fibonacci sequence is a sequence of numbers defined by the following rules: F<sub>1</sub> = 1, F<sub>2</sub> = 1, and
F<sub>n</sub> = F<sub>n-1</sub> + F<sub>n-2</sub> for integers n > 2.

(a) Write out the first 12 terms of the Fibonacci sequence

(b) Use mathematical induction to prove that F<sub>3k</sub> is even, and that F<sub>4k</sub> is a multiple of 3, for all positive integers k

(c) Hence, or otherwise, prove that F<sub>12k</sub> is divisible by 6, for all integers k > 0
I'll start you off on this one, and you can see how you go.

(a) F<sub>1</sub> = 1
F<sub>2</sub> = 1
F<sub>3</sub> = F<sub>2</sub> + F<sub>1</sub> = 1 + 1 = 2
F<sub>4</sub> = F<sub>3</sub> + F<sub>2</sub> = 2 + 1 = 3
F<sub>5</sub> = F<sub>4</sub> + F<sub>3</sub> = 3 + 2 = 5
F<sub>6</sub> = F<sub>5</sub> + F<sub>4</sub> = 5 + 3 = 8

keep going, you should find that F<sub>12</sub> = 144

(b) F<sub>3k</sub> ...
This is referring to the terms F<sub>3</sub>, F<sub>6</sub>, F<sub>9</sub>, F<sub>12</sub>, ...
You must prove that all such terms are even. Clearly the pattern holds for the first few terms (2, 8, 34, 144, ...). You are asked to use induction to prove that all such terms are even.

Similarly, show all F<sub>4k</sub> are divisible by 3

(c) I'll leave you to ponder ... :)
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
shkspeare said:
8. Prove by induction that, for all positive integers n,
2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>n</sup>) = 2<sup>n+2</sup> - 2(n + 2)


or 8 .. [does this have anything to do with geometric series?]

i have simplified the LHS as n[2(2^n-1)/(n-1)] .. but i cant seem to do the next step..
Yes, this does have something to do with geometric series, but that shouldn't come up until part B of the induction proof.

As for your simplification, there is definitely something wrong as the LHS must be an integer, but your expression is not an integer for n = 4, for example.
 

CM_Tutor

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 11, 2004
Messages
2,642
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
PS: I can probably find more induction questions, if people want them, including factorial induction and some 4u induction questions.
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
CM_Tutor said:
I'll start you off on this one, and you can see how you go.

(a) F<sub>1</sub> = 1
F<sub>2</sub> = 1
F<sub>3</sub> = F<sub>2</sub> + F<sub>1</sub> = 1 + 1 = 2
F<sub>4</sub> = F<sub>3</sub> + F<sub>2</sub> = 2 + 1 = 3
F<sub>5</sub> = F<sub>4</sub> + F<sub>3</sub> = 3 + 2 = 5
F<sub>6</sub> = F<sub>5</sub> + F<sub>4</sub> = 5 + 3 = 8

keep going, you should find that F<sub>12</sub> = 144
That becomes tedious as you get going. If you can remember that F<sub>n</sub> equals the nearest integer to &phi;<sup>n</sup>/&radic;5, where &phi; is the golden ratio (1/2 (1+&radic;5)) of course you probably wont remember it, but if you do it works well cause you then only have to change one number (the power) while having it on 0 dp.

*Solution to B and C, highlite to read (when I get the right color) :) *****
<font color="#D1D1E1">
b) F<sub>3k</sub>

A)
At k=1
F<sub>3</sub>=2
&there4; true for k=1

B) Assume true for k=j (I dont know what else to put here so "j" it is)
F<sub>3j</sub>=2P, where P is an integer
ie F<sub>3j-2</sub>+F<sub>3j-1</sub>=2P

C) Prove true for k=j+1
F<sub>3j+3</sub>=F<sub>3j+1</sub>+F<sub>3j+2</sub>
=F<sub>3j+2</sub>-F<sub>3j</sub>+F<sub>3j+2</sub>
=2(F<sub>3j+2</sub>)-2P
=2(F<sub>3j+2</sub>-P)
Since F<sub>3j+2</sub> and P are integers, it is true for k=j+1 if k=j

F<sub>4k</sub>
A) Prove true for k=1
F<sub>4</sub>=3 &there4; true for k=1

B) Assume true for k=j
F<sub>4j</sub>=3P where P is an integer

C) Prove true for k=j+1
F<sub>4j+4</sub>=F<sub>4j+2</sub>+F<sub>4j+3</sub>
=F<sub>4j</sub>+F<sub>4j+1</sub>+F<sub>4j+1</sub>+F<sub>4j+2</sub>
=F<sub>4j</sub>+F<sub>4j+1</sub>+F<sub>4j+1</sub>+F<sub>4j+1</sub>+F<sub>4j</sub>
=2F<sub>4j</sub>+3F<sub>4j+1</sub>
=2(3P)+3F<sub>4j+1</sub>
=3(2P+F<sub>4j+1</sub>)
Since P and F<sub>4j+1</sub> are integers, true for k=j+1, blah blah blah standard ending :)

part c)
F<sub>12k</sub>
Let Q=4k, &there4; F<sub>12k</sub>=F<sub>4Q</sub>
&there4; F<sub>4Q</sub> is divisible by 3 (as in part b)
similarly if R=4k, F<sub>3R</sub> is divisible by 2
&there4;, F<sub>12k</sub> is divisible by 3 and 2, &there4; it is a multiple of 3 and 2, ie it is a multiple of 6, &there4;, F<sub>12k</sub> is divisible by 6
</font>
EDIT: There are only so many colours it could be :)
 
Last edited:

:: ck ::

Actuarial Boy
Joined
Jan 1, 2003
Messages
2,414
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
golden ratio o_O!!!

blah!! >.<" i gotz no idea wtf that is T_T

CM u rkn u cud post up wot is considered 4unit induction, and some challenge q's on applications of calculus to physical world ?

also how hard can sequences and series get? my assessment sheet says some crap about "harder applications of sequences and series..." as a topic under "harder 2unit"

most of the q's on sequences and series just seem to be using the formula =\

thx! u r a legend :)
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
:: ryan.cck :: said:
golden ratio o_O!!!

blah!! >.<" i gotz no idea wtf that is T_T
The golden ratio is a cool number, &phi;<sup>2</sup>=&phi;+1, 1/&phi;=&phi;-1, as fibbonachi numbers get higher, F<sub>n</sub>/F<sub>n-1</sub> approaches &phi;, and lots of cool other things :)
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
shkspeare said:
8. Prove by induction that, for all positive integers n,
2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>n</sup>) = 2<sup>n+2</sup> - 2(n + 2)
Hmm I have an answer that looks dodgy, ie I use another induction to prove this induction inside it.

Humbug, I just figured out the geometrical series way, hmm well here is the original answer, Ill post the geometrical series way under it soon
****Highlight to read****
<font color="#D1D1E1">

A) Prove true for n=1

LHS=2
RHS=2<sup>3</sup>-6
=8-6
=2=LHS
&there4; true for n=1

B) Assume true for n=k
2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>k</sup>) = 2<sup>k+2</sup> - 2(k + 2)

C) Prove true for n=k+1
Ie trying to prove
2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>k</sup>)+(2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>k</sup>)+2<sup>k+1</sup>) = 2<sup>k+3</sup> - 2(k + 3)

Now 2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>k</sup>) = 2<sup>k+2</sup> - 2(k + 2) &there4; it is true if

(2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>k</sup>+2<sup>k+1</sup>) = 2<sup>k+3</sup> - 2(k + 3)-[2<sup>k+2</sup> - 2(k + 2)]
=2<sup>k+3</sup>-2k-6-2<sup>k+2</sup>+2k+4
=2*2<sup>k+2</sup>-2<sup>k+2</sup>-2
=2<sup>k+2</sup>-2
Dividing both sides by 2 to make it look neater
2<sup>0</sup>+2<sup>1</sup>+2<sup>2</sup>+....+2<sup>k</sup>=2<sup>k+1</sup>-1
&there4; it is true if the above is true

A<sub>2</sub>)Prove true for k=1
LHS=1+2
=3
RHS=2<sup>2</sup>-1
=3=LHS &there4; true for k=1

B<sub>2</sub>) Assume true for k=j
2<sup>0</sup>+2<sup>1</sup>+2<sup>2</sup>+....+2<sup>j</sup>=2<sup>j+1</sup>-1

C<sub>2</sub>) Prove true for k=j+1
2<sup>0</sup>+2<sup>1</sup>+2<sup>2</sup>+....+2<sup>j</sup>+2<sup>j+1</sup>=2<sup>j+1</sup>-1+2<sup>j+1</sup>
RHS=2*2<sup>j+1</sup>-1
=2<sup>j+2</sup>-1
&there4; true for k=j+1, &there4; true for k=1, 2, 3,... and for all positive integers.

As 2<sup>0</sup>+2<sup>1</sup>+2<sup>2</sup>+....+2<sup>k</sup>=2<sup>k+1</sup>-1 is true for all positive integers, 2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>n</sup>) = 2<sup>n+2</sup> - 2(n + 2) is true for n=1, 2, 3 and for all n>0
</font>

********Geometrical applications way (2nd time Ive posted this, stupid error) *******<font color="#D1D1E1">
A) and B) are the same
C)
2 + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup>) + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup>) + ... + (2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>k</sup>)+(2 + 2<sup>2</sup> + 2<sup>3</sup> + ... + 2<sup>k</sup>)+2<sup>k+1</sup>) =
2(2<sup>1</sup>-1)+2(2<sup>2</sup>-1)+2(2<sup>3</sup>-1)+.......+2(2<sup>k</sup>-1)+2(2<sup>k+1</sup>-1) [Each one is a geometric series, (r-1)=1]
=2(2+2<sup>2</sup>+2<sup>3</sup>+....+2<sup>k</sup>+2<sup>k+1</sup>-(k+1)) [yay another geometric series, and we had k+1 ones]
=2(2(2<sup>k+1</sup>-1)-(k+1))
=2(2<sup>k+2</sup>-k-1-2)
=2(2<sup>k+2</sup>-(k+3))
=2<sup>k+3</sup>-2(k+3)
&there4; true for n=k+1 and since true for n=1, true for n=2,3,4,5.... and for all n>0 </font>
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top