procrastinator2
Member
Definitely against it - religious reasons
Well, I think it should be the woman/girl's choice.what if all women just got tubal ligations and then had it reversed when theyre married to have kids
your name should be "procreator2" amirite?Definitely against it - religious reasons
Can't guarantee that those 1000 eggs would have had gone full-term within a pregnancy though A fertilised egg, which has not been inserted into a women's uterus can not feel, sense things etc. whereas a 1 year old child can. This is a stupid analogy...READ THIS:
One of the most common arguments against allowing people to have abortion is it is a person (like you and me) as sson as fertilization occurs. For that I put the following scenario, at an IVF clinic 1000s of fertilizations have been, one of the lab technician brings his 1 year old child in to work and leaves him in the lab and goes out for a smoke. There is a gas tank explosion and the clinic is on fire. The fire fighter goes in and has time to only take out one thing, a container holding all the 1000s of fertilized eggs or the child. Which one should he take? For the people who say that abortions shouldn't be performed because it is a person immediately after fertilization, the choice seems obvious, right? For them isn't is saving a 1000 people vs. 1?
Neither can a fertilised egg inside a uterus???Can't guarantee that those 1000 eggs would have had gone full-term within a pregnancy though A fertilised egg, which has not been inserted into a women's uterus can not feel, sense things etc. whereas a 1 year old child can. This is a stupid analogy...
I think the single answer to this is to give people the option of it. Then they can decide for themselves whether they want one or not. That way, everyone wins ^_^I do not believe there is one single answer to this. Each case has its own story and possible repercussions and it is futile to try and group everyone who has an abortion being either 'right' or 'wrong' by going ahead with it. At the end of the day, it is a deeply personal choice and as long as abortion is an option, few people will want to heed the advice of complete strangers (ie religious groups etc) on how to live their lives.
However, I don't know about others but personally, it would be hard for me to have that on my conscience. Even though there is still a debate about whether abortion is a form of murder, I think I would feel like a murderess regardless.
There was actually an experiment done with third year Harvard med students where they were given fifty images of cancer cells and fetuses and told to identify which was which. The students had something like a 40% success rate.
u seemvery masogonistic. why are you trying to control what women do with their bodies? its none of your business. if you are a women and get pregnant, it should be 100% ur choice on what you want to do.No they aren't.
Stopped reading here. Hated you instantly.
I agree and in actuality, the bible does not mention abortion at all - simply that you should not kill a pregnant women.The debate, as people interpret it, is pro-abortion v. anti-abortion. When in reality this not the debate on that matter, but rather on whether women have the right to do what they wish with THEIR body or not. If we ask, where does the anti-abortion view stem from? It stems from religion. Well I put this forth, how can the vatican be against abortion when none of their senior or medium leadership is women. How can they make such a statement.