Exactly, they are non verbal, they are equivalent to monkeys, probably inferior since they are a mutated human against a healthy gene monkeya lot of disabled people cant think so they cant empathise. i dont understand, if they cant consent to wanting to be alive, then why keep them?
You’re dehumanising them tho. Don’t do that. Consent is so complex when it comes to someone who has a disability. I don’t think consent should be what keeps them alive, it’s so specific to each circumstance each person will lead such a different life. You think a rich disabled person will have the same life as a poorer one? Definitely not, everyone will lead such a different lifea lot of disabled people cant think so they cant empathise. i dont understand, if they cant consent to wanting to be alive, then why keep them?
Unheard of
They’re really not tho why do you have to be like this omg…. Don’t dehumanise literal human beings. You don’t need to have a phd to know monkeys and humans are so different in so many waysExactly, they are non verbal, they are equivalent to monkeys, probably inferior since they are a mutated human against a healthy gene monkey
i'm so sorry you hurt my feelings bro Also I'm pretty sure right wing people are against abortions but okay@nonya2000 u r the bos equivalent of kanye. U say provocative and abhorrent things just to inflate ur dumb reactionary brain. Think of when lidia thorpe made that kerfuffle in front of king charles the other day. That is u. U r the right wing version of that. 90% of what u post is just to annoy and provoke and frankly idk what u think u even contribute to this site. Like y r u here bro?
but what do I know, I’m just a transgender illegal immigrant deranged Kamala supporter
if a person is human, but their brain cannot think or comprehend anything at all, why keep them alive? they dont exist for happiness, they dont know what that is. just cause they are human doesnt mean they should be aliveYou’re dehumanising them tho. Don’t do that. Consent is so complex when it comes to someone who has a disability. I don’t think consent should be what keeps them alive, it’s so specific to each circumstance each person will lead such a different life. You think a rich disabled person will have the same life as a poorer one? Definitely not, everyone will lead such a different life
Exactly. Imagine them trying to apply the same logic to a mass shooterif a person is human, but their brain cannot think or comprehend anything at all, why keep them alive? they dont exist for happiness, they dont know what that is. just cause they are human doesnt mean they should be alive
Even if they say no, it's not no consent. You can't consent until 16 years of age. Like when you go to the hospital, your parents have to sign for you until your 16.i think it should be under the parents discretion to euthanise their babies up to 5 years old, even if they can consent and say no
aborting potentially disabled people is only a tiny proportion of all abortions. many many more people get abortions simply because theyve been irresponsible. also, be careful with what youre saying about disabled people because many of them still live fulfilling livesDefinitely pro choice. If you don't let anyone do abortions, more and more disabled people, such as people with down syndrome, will have to unfortunately suffer living a miserable life. Plus it keeps the gene pool healthy too. That's the first thought that comes to mind when I hear about abortions becoming illegal in the US.
It's also the most justifiable abortion reason.aborting potentially disabled people is only a tiny proportion of all abortions. many many more people get abortions simply because theyve been irresponsible. also, be careful with what youre saying about disabled people because many of them still live fulfilling lives
you realise you're basically advocating for eugenics?It's also the most justifiable abortion reason.
what's wrong with it? It's literally a horribly dysfunctional gene. Also this type of abortion has been in practice for many years in Australia. Why would you willingly give birth to a "hag-seed"you realise you're basically advocating for eugenics?
whats wrong is that youre not valuing all life, youd classify some as more subhuman than others. need i elaborate why thats wrong?what's wrong with it? It's literally a horribly mutated gene.
yah cause they are, in fact, sub human.whats wrong is that youre not valuing all life, youd classify some as more subhuman than others. need i elaborate why thats wrong?