HumanDichotomy
Member
Lol.
Yeah so true.Tall Poppy Syndrome
We love to bring them up, then tear 'em down...
Uh, yeah.fair go mate
we should take smart wealthy people's money and give it to me for not working
fair go mate
Sounds pretty fair tbh. They would do greater than 90x the level of productive capacity of the average employee, and are the reason those people have jobs in the first place.Uh, yeah.
Meanwhile, back in the real world, multinational business executives get paid up to 90 times more than the average employee, certainly not for doing 90 times as much work. Does that sound fair to you?
Well superficially, it would seem fair.Sounds pretty fair tbh. They would do greater than 90x the level of productive capacity of the average employee, and are the reason those people have jobs in the first place.
Cool, don't buy their products, then. Don't bail them out, then.Well superficially, it would seem fair.
However, consider this: General Motors' CEO earns a salary in the millions - up with the 90-times higher benchmark I used earlier. However, the CEO of Toyota, which is actually the larger company, earns less than 1 million US per year. I doubt that the average workload of the two CEOs could be much different - I might be wrong, but I think that it's highly unlikely. Above all, this points to the fact that the salaries of CEOs, especially in the 'Western' world, are often fairly arbitrary and do not reflect the actual level of productivity of those higher levels of management - hence the reason they vary so widely.
Another topical point is that many American business executives were paid bonuses during the GFC's darkest hour (as we have all heard before) and thus those huge monetary windfalls could hardly be said to be the result of a higher level of productivity. In fact, business executives are not paid so highly in America and Australia simply because they are productive, but often as an incentive to remain with that particular organisation.
So the notion of an Australian fair go is a homogenous society where each worker is allocated one AM radio by the chief bureaucrat? Fuck that, I'll take selfishness and self-interest any day over that.Anyway, back to the point. The fact is that my previous post was meant to suggest that this uneven wealth distribution was arbitrary and unfair, and thus that altering this would be an example of the 'fair go'. Its not really got that much to do with australian values at all, apart from that it would presumably be an 'Australian' thing to do if one were to change it.