MedVision ad

Bill may rob 80,000 of election say (1 Viewer)

Generator

Active Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2002
Messages
5,244
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/06/14/1087065084849.html

Bill may rob 80,000 of election say
By Cynthia Banham
June 15, 2004

Page Tools
Email to a friend Printer format
The Federal Government was accused yesterday of trying to push through electoral changes that would undermine democracy and see an estimated 80,000 young people and all prisoners denied a vote in the coming election.

The Senate is due to vote this week on the bill, under which the electoral rolls would be closed to people enrolling to vote for the first time the moment a federal election is called. New voters presently have a seven-day window after the campaign begins in which to enrol.

People transferring to a new electorate would be given only three days, rather than a week, to inform the Australian Electoral Commission of a change of address. The AEC estimated this would affect 200,000 people.

The bill is unlikely to pass, with Labor and the Democrats opposed to the change, which goes against the recommendations of a bipartisan parliamentary committee.

The Opposition Leader, Mark Latham, said an immediate closure of the electoral roll to new voters would "disenfranchise many young Australians, particularly young Australians, from being able exercise their democratic right on polling day".

Advertisement
Advertisement
Under a second proposal, all prisoners, regardless of the duration of their sentence, would be prohibited from voting. Presently only prisoners serving a jail sentence of more than five years are not allowed to vote.

The latest figures from the Australian Institute of Criminology indicate the prison population is about 22,500.

Labor says such a move would breach international obligations under the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the United Nations Universal Declaration on Human Rights.

In a speech to Parliament, the Labor frontbencher Bob McMullan said the proposed change was flawed because it would affect prisoners serving short sentences if their time in prison coincided with an election.

"A person sentenced to eight weeks in jail which coincided with an election period could not vote, yet another prisoner, sentenced to two years in jail which coincided with a favourable electoral cycle, would be able to vote," Mr McMullan said.

The Democrats leader, Andrew Bartlett, said the change would unfairly discriminate against indigenous people, because of their higher incarceration rate.

However the Government, which also wants to increase the disclosure threshold for political donations from $1500 to $3000 as a part of the same package of reforms, defended its proposals.

The Special Minister of State, Eric Abetz, told the ABC: "If you're not fit to walk the streets as deemed by the judicial system in this country, then chances are you're not a fit and proper person to cast a vote .. . "





I do not think that anyone has raised this issue... recently. Luckily Labor and Democrats will not let it pass.
 

eviltama

Mentally Deranged Maniac
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
856
Location
Yaoiville
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
luckily? pffft

i dunno wtf has gotten up howard.. its like hes purposely trying NOT to get voted in. Everything he's done recently just stamps a big red NO next to his name as far as im concerned.

But that doesnt help me any since i can't stand Latham.
 

um..

hip hop antagoniser
Joined
Dec 23, 2002
Messages
1,303
Location
10:15 Saturday Night
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Originally posted by eviltama
luckily? pffft

i dunno wtf has gotten up howard.. its like hes purposely trying NOT to get voted in. Everything he's done recently just stamps a big red NO next to his name as far as im concerned.

But that doesnt help me any since i can't stand Latham.
but he's doing this is an effort to retain office - so people like you wont have the oppurtunity to vote against him

you just werent supposed to know
 
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
66
who gives a fuck...if their tooo lazy to vote....goood on them as long as they dont get fined for not voting who gives a fuck..

.i would love to be able to not bother gettting my name ticked offf.....................voting is just a waste of time..i wish i never registered to vote -------- those people are lucky
 

eviltama

Mentally Deranged Maniac
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
856
Location
Yaoiville
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2002
Originally posted by um..
but he's doing this is an effort to retain office - so people like you wont have the oppurtunity to vote against him

you just werent supposed to know
who said i'd vote against him. But if this is the things he thinks will gain him office... then he needs to seek medical help.
 

neo o

it's coming to me...
Joined
Aug 16, 2002
Messages
3,294
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
The Democrats leader, Andrew Bartlett, said the change would unfairly discriminate against indigenous people, because of their higher incarceration rate.
That's funny because it's true.
 

neo o

it's coming to me...
Joined
Aug 16, 2002
Messages
3,294
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Oh and that bill won't be passed full stop, so its irrelevant, the new voters bill anyway.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top