spell check
Member
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2004
- Messages
- 842
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 1998
you know i was reading up on birds the other day and, apparently, they can fly across borders and stuff? did you know this? wow.
Schoolies_2004 said:Firstly, Australia does show empathy and does share its freedom with others of this world! Dont distort the facts here, there are correct avenues of entering this country, and doing so via a boat isnt one of them. This isnt only illegal and stupid (considering the boats they go on) its a substantial security risk to Australia.....terroritsts could be on board, or more concerning, potentially sick indiviuduals may be on boad along with animals suffering from contagious diseases.....ie Bird Flu (If you watched 60mins yesterday, perfect eg). Furthermore, Australia does keep a certain amount of these boat people, so I think empathy is being showed. And on top of this all, Australia is pumping billions of dollars into their home countries
And your reference to the white Australia policy is laughable, considering a large portion of non-white inidividuals live in Australia now. The issue at hand isnt what nationality they are, its how they are entering our nation. They avoid the usual screening process through immigration beacuse no doubt alot of them are undesirable - and as someone mentioned previously, the process invovles choosing people who will be beneficial to society, not become bums. I will however say that in some circumstances our immigration department is ruthless, I remember watching this program about immigration and they deported some guy because he had a visa that did not let him work....like come on, if the guys working, good on him, at least he isnt buming off the government! (The argument against this may be that hes taking a job away from an Aussie, well I disagree, if a guy who barely speaks english can get a job why cant someone living in the slums find a job- because ther bludges, having 5 kids and blugding off the govt) Just my opinion on that matter.
BTW, dont get me wrong, Im aware that alot of them have faced harships etc, but for our own security 'you have to be cruel to be kind'. Besides, Australia isnt the only nation in the pacific..maybe the only one that easily accessible by boat, but thats about it
Tarni you don't go to galston high do you?Tarni1 said:..chickens on board? to survive on? I don't belive you know what you are talking about...
and terrorists would not risk their lives on leaky boats..most people coming to australia are proved to be genuine refugees
60 minutes/todaytonight etc are all sensationalist shows which distort the truth..and in doing so the vunerable which exist in the aus society believe the truth they present. If your 'sources' which make up your opinions on refugees are based on 60 minutes, well then, I think that's enough said.
Our society is becoming based on fear eg howard winning the election on the overboard crisis (untrue), the war (what WOMD?!), terrorist laws (targeting certain groups, taking away our rights) etc This fear is generated by the Liberals and others; it is up to us to find the truth behind the lies.
you may laugh at my comment about the white aus policy, however it is not so ridiculous
..I wouldn't take Mr. Martin's items too seriously if I were you..
No I don'terawamai said:Tarni you don't go to galston high do you?
Lozacious said:"Overboard crisis"? That's quite a funny phrase, because it's used by left wing numb skulls to try to say "oh my god we were deceived". Even if "kids" weren't thrown over board, we still don't want them here..
define 'we' and they're not TRYING to say something, they're stating it was a deception..
see, this is wrong.there are correct avenues of entering this country, and doing so via a boat isnt one of them
Really? You don't believe you are entitled to anything at all found in the ICCPR?Lozacious said:International law says a lot of things. All of it is bullshit.
You don't agree that children should be happy and grow up in a loving environment?CROC said:Recognizing that the child, for the full and harmonious development of his or her personality, should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding
You don't agree?croc said:1. States Parties shall use their best efforts to ensure recognition of the principle that both parents have common responsibilities for the upbringing and development of the child. Parents or, as the case may be, legal guardians, have the primary responsibility for the upbringing and development of the child. The best interests of the child will be their basic concern.
You don't agree with childrens talents being encouraged?croc said:1. States Parties agree that the education of the child shall be directed to:
(a) The development of the child's personality, talents and mental and physical abilities to their fullest potential;
can some a law student possibly comment on this, but i was under the impression that being a refugee IS legal. i thought the legitimate status of a refugee was discerned during the screening process...Schoolies_2004 said:Disease is not a diversion at all. Illegal refugees come to Australia with the intetion of not being caught...how many might reach land and converge within the general populous? And the major threat is the poultry they have on board, all it takes is one animal to have a disease like Bird Flu, and a local animal coming in contact with it and then......................................................
those wacky lefties!Lozacious said:No.. just sent away. It's a fairly good indicator of the way Australians feel about these kinds of people. The quim isn't that they are "refugees" or "illegal immigrants"..
It's that we don't want their kind there.. and we are will to use what little power we have to get them to go away.... And we still fail, and are STILL criticized.
The left should fear that one day the average Australian will have enough of its rubbish, and will schizophrenically decapitate its being. We see all the time, the poisonous fruits emitted from its tree. One day, its trunk shall be axed.
them and their peace and lovewalrusbear said:those wacky lefties!
yeah the majority will be able to stamp out their silly belief in human rightsspell check said:them and their peace and love
THEY MUST BE STOPPED!
My bad, I meant have said 'illegal immigrants'can some a law student possibly comment on this, but i was under the impression that being a refugee IS legal.
You know that bird specialists have said that none of Australias migratory birds should have got into contact with any birds in infected areas? Did you know this? wow.you know i was reading up on birds the other day and, apparently, they can fly across borders and stuff? did you know this? wow.
Im sorry, they survive on thin air and drink from the seas plentiful bounty of water. Chickens are a cheap, long lasting resource, and low maintainence, numerous sources have shown that they use them to. This is a disease threat, plain and simple. Whether you want to allow the bird flu into Australia so the refugees feel nice or want to protect our nation from an outbreak of disease is up to you as an individual.chickens on board? to survive on? I don't belive you know what you are talking about...
REALISM IS THE ONLY ANSWERLozacious said:Fantasy is what it is.
The left is anything but peace and love.. Well when it comes to their treatment of white at least anyway.