• YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

Challenge complex numbers problem for current students (1 Viewer)

Faera

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
48
Location
Sydney
haha, i'll say...

but can you use the limit as x ---> -0 ? because when x < 0 you dont get a smooth curve...

i think...

would it matter if it wasnt a smooth curve?
 

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Really?

:p [/B]
yes, really. :D Read:

Originally posted by Grey Council

how do you get x^0 = 1?
x=x^1
divide by x on both sides:
x/x = x^0
= 1
I PROVED that x^0 = 1. :p why would I ask you something which I already knew how to PROVE? (forget about knowing about it lol) :p ;)

hehe, btw, Faera, if you got that 0^0 is undefined, than it must be undefined.

hell, David Chan, (turtle_2468) told me its undefined, so I think I'll believe him. ^_^
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Originally posted by Grey Council
I PROVED that x^0 = 1. :p why would I ask you something which I already knew how to PROVE? (forget about knowing about it lol) :p ;)
But you forgot x<>0 as you divided by x.
 

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
well, not taking the case of x=0 (cause thats what the whole debate is about, right? ;) )

anyway, just stick in 0^0 on your calculator, it says error.
so its undefined. ^_^
 
Last edited:

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
yes but if I also do 10<sup>100</sup> it says maths error, does that make 10<sup>100</sup> undefined? Or if I chuck e<sup>-i</sup> it also comes up with a maths error (even when its in the mode for complex calculation :chainsaw: )
 

Faera

Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2004
Messages
48
Location
Sydney
e ^ (-i) is not in the form x^x...
nor is 10^100
and the only reason the thing says error calc can't handle that because it's too large a number...
try doing it on your comp...
 

Xayma

Lacking creativity
Joined
Sep 6, 2003
Messages
5,953
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I know, but just because a calc puts it as undefined doesnt make it so. Of course x<sup>x</sup> is probably undefined.
 

Grey Council

Legend
Joined
Oct 14, 2003
Messages
1,426
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
sigh

Okay, the definitve answer. ^___^

the defn of 0^0 is plain silly. Because the only way you get numbers to the power of zero from basic axioms, power definitions etc is to start from x=x^1 and divide, you get x/x=x^0. But you can't divide by 0 so 0/0 and hence 0^0 is plain silly...
The reason you can get 0^(0.1), for example, is that you can say 0^1=0
and letting the weird number above be m
m^10=0^1=0
so m=0
But doing 0^0 is a whole different ball game...

2. You know probability of k heads in n coins is nCk/2^n
So probability of both ppl getting k heads is (nCk)^2/2^2n
So all you have to prove is that (the sum from 0 to n of (nCk)^2)/2^2n=(2n)! / [2^(2n) * (n!)^2]
ie sum from 0 to n of (nCk)^2)=(2n)!/(n!)^2 (note lhs = no. of ways of getting same no of heads)
So restating problem 2:
Equivalent to -
Show that the number of ways that they get the same number of heads is
(2n)Cn.
Proof: By establishing a bijection (ie correlating one way to get same heads with one way to pick n items from 2n).

Arrange the 2n objects in a row, and draw a line down the middle (separating objects into left and right). The ones you pick, tick them, the ones you don't, cross them.
A tick means heads on the left, and tails on the right. A cross means tails on the left, and heads on the right.
This establishes a relation between the two, basically as it "preserves" the constant k between the two sides, k being (left heads-left tails)-(right heads - right tails). cross decreases k by 1, ticks increases by 1. As cross=ticks, k stays at 0 by the time all the ticks and crosses are converted into heads and tails ie heads-tails is same on both sides ie heads is same on both sides.
 

Kirsti

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2003
Messages
334
Location
Newcastle
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
oooh! i took the first one as being z^(n-1) not (z^n) -1
hmm.. that makes it easier
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top