MedVision ad

Challenge integral (3 Viewers)

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
445
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
There is a problem with the answer here. The function is positive throughout its domain. Yet, using the result presented:


The result as written does work for the domain , though.
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
445
Gender
Male
HSC
2023





We need to factorise the denominator:



The integrand can now be decomposed using partial fractions:




 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
445
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
also what application did u use to do ur working
I typed it in the box for posting replies.

Note that the original solution posted:


does works on some domains - for example, on .

However, for the domain , the integral is


This tells me that there is an issue with signs or in making the assumption that when, in fact and is only when .

Note, for example, that I did not make the substitution as it would follow that ... instead, I substituted and avoided a potential problem. Far too many papers include substitutions that raise problems that are then ignored, yielding correct answers but from technically-flawed working.
 

Luukas.2

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
445
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
Now for a follow up question: hence or otherwise integrate sqrt(tanx):)

The partial fractions result will now yield both inverse tan and log terms.

Alternatively, focus on


and then subtract the result from the integral found earlier in this thread.
 

SB257426

Very Important User
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
309
Location
Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Gender
Male
HSC
2023
I typed it in the box for posting replies.

Note that the original solution posted:


does works on some domains - for example, on .

However, for the domain , the integral is


This tells me that there is an issue with signs or in making the assumption that when, in fact and is only when .

Note, for example, that I did not make the substitution as it would follow that ... instead, I substituted and avoided a potential problem. Far too many papers include substitutions that raise problems that are then ignored, yielding correct answers but from technically-flawed working.
Brilliant answer btw
 

member 6003

Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2022
Messages
83
Gender
Male
HSC
2023





We need to factorise the denominator:



The integrand can now be decomposed using partial fractions:




Good answer but there's an easier way than doing partial fraction decomposition, so I thought I might share it:



The logic is basically trying to find a way to cancel the nominator with a substitution so


then making the substitution,

which should lead to the same solution but simplified with the tan inverses combined
 
Joined
Aug 4, 2021
Messages
85
Gender
Male
HSC
2023

The partial fractions result will now yield both inverse tan and log terms.

Alternatively, focus on


and then subtract the result from the integral found earlier in this thread.
nice, i was intending for it to be done by sqrt(tanx) = 1/2 (sqrttanx + sqrtcotx + sqrttanx - sqrtcotx) tho
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 3)

Top