That's the textbook answer, I also always got the answer of 0.36. And would the significant figures here for the answer be 2 SF since the % can be expressed as 0.92?Just checking is ur provided answer correct, because no matter how many times i do it i still get 0.3588t
It is conquering chem so yeah I think it may be a mistakei like 4 but u would prolly go for 2, umm is it from the conquering chem book cause its been known to have mistakes here and there. But i would throw my back behind 0.36 because logically speaking 1t with 92% efficiency translate to 0.92 tonnes anyways and when you work yield both Na and Cl and add them up u get the 0.92t
Do you mind clarifying this bit? It's the only part I don't really getIt is ambiguous if you simply say that the DH of the formation of water from hydrogen and oxygen is -572kJ because you can write the chemical equation in different ways (like in the two equations you typed up, in one, 2 moles of water is formed and in the other, 1 mole of water is formed). So it is unclear which equation it is referring to.
However, if you say DH = -572kJ per mole of oxygen, now we know how to set up the equation such that the DH is relevant & applicable, i.e., using the 1st equation.
Hopefully that made sense and it didn't seem like I was just restated what was said :S
So if we're looking at the DH per mole of oxygen in the formation of water from H & O, we set up the equation such that its in terms of 1 mole of oxygen, i.e.Do you mind clarifying this bit? It's the only part I don't really get
Ohhhhh alright, I get it. Thanks manSo if we're looking at the DH per mole of oxygen in the formation of water from H & O, we set up the equation such that its in terms of 1 mole of oxygen, i.e.
2H2 + O2 -> 2H2O
But if we were looking at DH per mole of hydrogen (or water), divide everything by 2 to get:
H2 + (1/2)O2 -> H2O
Let's break down the name first: 1,2-dibromoethaneThanks for the help Nightweaver and Someth1ng. I haven't learnt this yet but curiosity stops me from moving ahead with the content:
How does one interpret 1,2-dibromoethane? The structural formula is given in the textbook (Page 9 Conquering Chem HSC) but I'm not sure about how to name it? (It's still too early)
Oh, I just meant that I started the course yesterday and I'm assuming you learn this later?Let's break down the name first: 1,2-dibromoethane
Italics: Tells us any added atoms. "Bromo" tells us there is bromine, and "di" tells us there are two of them.
Underlined: Tells us the positioning of the atoms. Since it is "1,2", there is one bromine atom on each C atom. We always count from ascending to descending.
IIRC, i learnt how to do naming in Energy in the prelim course.Oh, I just meant that I started the course yesterday and I'm assuming you learn this later?
And from ascending to descending you just mean left to right? So for alkanes, do we always go from ascending to descending? Because for alkenes I recall in prelim you just number them based on the direction that minimises the number for the double bond :S
I've never seen things like "1,2" and I always thought this was only applied to alkenes in general lolIIRC, i learnt how to do naming in Energy in the prelim course.
Its not always necessarily from left to right, but from the side such that you start with the lowest number.
lol i just realised what i said made no sense at all.. "ascending to descending". What i meant was what i just said above :L Sorry about that
The OH takes precedence over the bromo so we have to count such that the OH has the lowest number.
Naming goes alphabetical order Iirc - so B before H etc.
Fakn nightrider posted before me.The OH takes precedence over the bromo so we have to count such that the OH has the lowest number.
Read over this site:
http://www.chem.ucalgary.ca/courses/351/orgnom/main/rules.html