• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

complex number question (1 Viewer)

香港!

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Messages
467
Location
asdasdas
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2010
well the equation is a polynomial w\ real coefficients
so by conjugate root theorem, 1-i is a root so 1+i is also a root
then by inspection z=3
so u got the three roots
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
So you just use the conjugate of one of the roots and use factor theorem?
 

香港!

Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2005
Messages
467
Location
asdasdas
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2010
kadlil said:
So you just use the conjugate of one of the roots and use factor theorem?
u can do that..
but u can also do dis:
sum of roots
let A be the other root
(1-i)+(1+i)+A=5
2+A=5
A=3
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
This is the example solution it says

z = 1 - i is a root, z = 1 + i is another root.

They correspond to the factor z2 - 2z + 2.
I don't understand that :confused:
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
(a) If x and y are real numbers such that
(x+yi)2 = 4+3i
(i) find real numbers a and b such that
(x-yi)2 = a+bi

(b) Solve the equation
(z2-4)2 + 9 = 0


(a)
(i) a = 4 and b = -3
(ii) x = ±3/√2 and y = ±1/√2

(b) Can't do

ANSWERS:
(a)
(i) a = 4 and b = -3
(ii) x = ±3/√2 and y = ±1/√2

(b) ±3/√2 ±(1/√2)i
 
Joined
Mar 26, 2004
Messages
154
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Part b) is a complex difference of two squares, just like you can factorise x^2+1=(x+i)(x-1), so you can do the same thing with this.
So (x^2-4+3i)(x^2-4-3i)=(x^2-4)^2+9
Then u use part (i) to find the square roots of 4+3i/4-3i and ure home shweet
 

Trev

stix
Joined
Jun 28, 2004
Messages
2,037
Location
Pine Palace, St. Lucia, Brisbane.
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
(x+yi)²=4+3i
x²+y²+2xyi=4+3i
Taking real and unreal parts:
x²+y²=4
2xy=3; solve simultaneously.
Same method for part (i)

b)
(z²-4)²=-9
z²-4=+/-3i
z²=4+/-3i; let z=a+bi
(a+bi)²=4+3i, and (a+bi)²=4-3i; expand and solve simultaneously like in (a); a different method to what is posted above.
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Ah i'm bored here, so i'll just finish off trev's solution:
(a+bi)2=4+3i
a2-b2+2abi=4+3i
equate real and imaginary parts to get 2 equations
a2-b2=4 (1)
ab=3/2 (2)
from (2),
b=3/2a (3)
sub (3) in (1)
a2-(3/2a)2=4
a2-9/4a2=4
4a4-16a2-9=0
(2a2-9)(2a2+1)=0
a=+/- 3/sqrt2 (rationalising denom. gives +/- 3sqrt2/2)
sub a values into (3)
b=+/- sqrt2/2
.: sqrt(4+3i)= [3sqrt2+(sqrt2)i]/2, [-3sqrt2-(sqrt2)i/]2
sqrt(4-3i) would be very similar, too so just follow the same procedure.
(I'm not typing all this again... too tired -_-)
 

justchillin

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2005
Messages
210
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
The easiest way to do this question is to recognise that the complex conjugate is a root..then find a quadratic factor then find the other factor by inspection (ie see that u have to put to get the 1st and last terms of the polynomial...
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
Deduce that if @ is a non-real root of ax2 + bx + c = 0, where a,b,c are real, then @-bar is the other root of this quadratic equation
 

Stefano

Sexiest Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
296
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kadlil said:
Deduce that if @ is a non-real root of ax2 + bx + c = 0, where a,b,c are real, then @-bar is the other root of this quadratic equation
@ = {-b +/- root.[b<sup>2</sup>-4ac]}/2a (Quadratic Formula)

Therefore, the roots are:

1. {-b + root.[b<sup>2</sup>-4ac]}/2a (@)

2. {-b - root.[b<sup>2</sup>-4ac]}/2a (@-bar)


Understood?
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
This doctor math thing has an interesting bit of reasoning for it: http://mathforum.org/library/drmath/view/53874.html

EDIT: Maybe I should have read my text book :p, it seems that the Arnold one has a decent little proof which, abbreviated, goes like this:

Let P(x) be a polynomial with real coefficients and a complex zero &alpha; where &alpha; = a +bi and &alpha;bar = a - bi.

Then consider D(x) = (x - &alpha; )(x - &alpha;bar) = x<sup>2</sup> - 2Re(&alpha; )x + |&alpha;|<sup>2</sup>

Using the division transformation you can express P(x) as P(x) = D(x).Q(x) + R(x) and deg R < deg D = 2.

P(x) = (x - &alpha; )(x - &alpha;bar)Q(x) + cx + d

P(&alpha; ) = c&alpha; + d , and P(&alpha;bar) = c(&alpha;bar) + d = (c&alpha; + d)bar = [P(&alpha; )]bar

Hence it follows that if P(&alpha; ) = 0 then P(&alpha;bar)=0
 
Last edited:

acmilan

I'll stab ya
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
3,989
Location
Jumanji
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
You can prove that complex roots come in conjugate pairs:

Take P(x) = a0 + a1x1 + a2x2 + a3x3 + ... + anxn

If you assume z is a root, then sub z into the RHS and make the RHS = 0

a0 + a1z1 + a2z2 + a3z3 + ... + anzn = 0

Then take the conjugate of both sides, manipulate using addition of conjugate rules and the fact that conjugates of real numbers are the same real number, and youll find you get z bar also being a root.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top