• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Continued Surd (1 Viewer)

Tsylana

Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
80
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
BHHS 2009 Ext 2 Trial Question 6 part c


haha a bit of a strange question that i have no idea how to do..

its just pratically find the limitting value of what i posted underneath =)
 
Last edited:

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Strictly speaking, you probably need to use the Monotone Convergence Theorem to prove that the limit of this thing exists (which means to do this question properly is beyond the 4u syllabus), but if you are willing to accept that it converges on faith, then you let x=that thing with all the surds.

Squaring both sides, we have x^2 = 6 + x, which you solve as a simple quadratic. Clearly x is positive, so you take the positive answer, which, as noted, is 3.
 

Tsylana

Member
Joined
May 4, 2008
Messages
80
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
I must say that's pretty elegant...

I like it... good question.
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
I must say that's pretty elegant...

I like it... good question.
As Iruka pointed out, this presupposes the existence of a limit which in turn requires the sequence of continued surds is i) monotone increasing and ii) has an upper bound.
 
Last edited:

untouchablecuz

Active Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
1,693
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
could someone post up a formal proof of the said continued fractions convergence

...please :shy:
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
untouchablecuz - I'll attempt proof here.


 
Last edited:

jet

Banned
Joined
Jan 4, 2007
Messages
3,148
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
But you just proved the limit, didn't you?
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
But you just proved the limit, didn't you?
I just established the conditions for existence of a limit. It so happens 3 is an upper bound - in fact the least upper bound (the lub or infimum) and is therefore the limit. But I have not established that 3 is the infimum.

Edit:

I made some typo error and tried to correct and have now ruined my posting; anyway of retrieving it ?
 
Last edited:

Iruka

Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
544
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
It is not mathematically valid to do ordinary arithmetic with infinite sums and products unless you have established that they converge. There are many examples of paradoxes that arise if you try to do this.

So, as Drogonski has done, you have to establish that the sequence converges to a limit before you can go about finding the limit. So in this case, you use MCT to prove the limit exists. (That is, you need to prove that the sequence is monotonically increasing and bounded above.) You could possibly also prove Cauchy convergence.
 

Drongoski

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
4,255
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Oh heck! Have to re-construct my "proof" all over again; earler post ruined in a botched editing.



 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top