For fucks sake, that's the thing, their religion is not a choice.
Oh, really? So, according to you, people are
forced to believe something they don't want to believe? I don't think that's possible.
They are born into Islam and don't have a chance to leave.
There have been cases of people leaving Islam. Some notable ones too.
If they convert out they will be ostracized. Not that they should have to convert out, they should be allowed to follow it whichever way they please, although that isn't a choice in these countries where they are forced to wear a head covering and are restricted from certain professions.
You know, many Muslim countries, the majority actually, don't enforce the head covering. You can't keep using Saudi Arabia as an example for everything, you know. There are other Muslim countries out there.
That's a laugh, domestic violence is 'rampant' here? Only reason we know that is because it's an offence. In Arab/Muslim countries either it's not an offence because your husband has the right to do whatever he wants with you or because the case will always be thrown out of court. I can assure you 100% that there is more domestic violence in Arab/Muslim countries, I don't even need statistics, it's common sense.
You're questioning whether domestic violence is rampant in Australia? You're kidding, right? Do you read the newspapers? Domestic violence cases are heard
all the time. And those are just the ones being reported to the police.
Also, for the millionth time, what are you talking about? The husband has the right to do whatever he wants to his wife? Wrong. That isn't right Islamically, nor according to any political system I've heard of. Give me one example of any country, where a husband has the right to do
anything he wants with his wife.
It's an extreme example, but you're arguing the same thing in principle.
Nah, I don't think I am. What I was and am arguing, is no where
near as extreme as comparing the plight of Muslims living in Islamic countries to the suffering of the Jews.
Pretty irrelevent, the fact remains that women are forced to be covered up no matter what their own preference is. Can't see how that is a good thing, unless you're going to go down the Sheik Hilali path and argue that it protects against rape?
The point is, in Saudi Arabia it is the law. It doesn't matter what you think. It matters what
they think. And I honestly believe that the majority of them don't have a problem with it. If they did, why would many women living in Saudi Arabia take the initiative to cover themselves even further, by only allowing their eyes to be visible?
Rarely if ever happens. Recently the fact that women could become taxi drivers in Iran (although they could only serve female customers) became news. And I don't see many, if any female members in their parliaments etc?
You used the example of Iran. So I will too. A lot of women are employed in Iran, yeah maybe not as taxi drivers, but a lot of them are doctors and teachers.
You know, there is one major problem with your arguements. You clump all Islamic countries under one heading and insist they oppress their people, but you fail to realise that each country has separate laws for its people. One thing that may be occurring in one Islamic country may not necessarily be happening in another. Through this fashion, you create the impression that the entirety of Islamic countries imitate the likes of Saudi Arabia and Iran. In a lot of cases, the only similarity between two Muslim countries is the fact that they both are Muslim.
I read that article. Does it say that women are the property of their husbands? No, it does not say that. You're once again creating a false impression.
But I have to admit, Saudi Arabia really has done something abominable. In Islam, the marriage of pre-pubescent girls is forbidden, and I fail to see why they ruled that marriage legal. But the fact that it was news, just proves exactly that. That it's news. It wouldn't be, if this sort of thing were happening daily. Still sad, though.