wannabesurgeon
Member
I remember when we were learning calculus a couple of weeks back we were doing differentiation by first principles and then the short method came along and I was ecstatic xD
If by currently, you mean flying over to the US tomorrow to begin, then yesCool, Andrew is my supervisor at the moment. Are you his old student who is currently working with Peter Sarnak?
Exciting! Best of luck . I may run into you some time in the future.If by currently, you mean flying over to the US tomorrow to begin, then yes
Lol, yeah that is cool. There's two ways of actually doing that.
You can extend the factorial to all complex numbers except for the non-positive integers using the gamma function0! = 1
*non-positive integers*You can extend the factorial to all complex numbers except for the negative integers using the gamma function
It's not too hard to prove that using integration by parts which means when is a positive integer.
Is this because there is only 1 way to pick nothing? Or is there a deeper reason?0! = 1
By convention the product of an empty collection of numbers is 1 and the sum of an empty collection of numbers is 0. I stress that this is just convention, it is convenient for this to be the definition.Is this because there is only 1 way to pick nothing? Or is there a deeper reason?
Yep. The empty set could be said to have only 1 possible permutation (identity permutation).Is this because there is only 1 way to pick nothing? Or is there a deeper reason?
Reminds me of this nice resultYou can extend the factorial to all complex numbers except for the non-positive integers using the gamma function
It's not too hard to prove that using integration by parts which means when is a positive integer.
Big +1. I find things like this much more beautiful than random analysis identities...because they are ideas that are universal. Simple and elegant.Not really a result, but I absolutely love The Pigeonhole Principle. So intuitive to understand yet oh so effective for many more complex problems
1If my sock drawer has 4 pairs of matching socks, and I pick 5 socks at random, what is the probability of me getting at least 1 matching pair?
Haha we studied that in 1st Year SSP to compute convergents for continued fractions.A cooler application: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet's_approximation_theorem . Related to 1989 Q8.
Nice! Did you look at Pell's equation?Haha we studied that in 1st Year SSP to compute convergents for continued fractions.