In a exam, this type of question would be worth about 5-7 marks, and not just explaining the cost, but also its viability, usefulness and its advantages and disadvantages.
Cellulose
1. It is renewable resource, cellulose is a large component of biomass
2. Glucose can be extracted from the cellulose and fermentated to make ethanol, then to ethylene by dehydration
3. Cost is much more expensive and the processing cost is expensive. Not economically viable. Also, extracting glucose from cellulose is much exhaustive process than starch. So, the cost is high, and not viable for the production of plastic bags, etc
4. The energy input (crude oil) for fermentation/dehydration can use more crude oil than in original form
Crude oil
1. Easily cracked (catalytic or thermal) into various petrol products, and cost effective
2. Easily extracted from underground
3. Cheaper source of ethylene to make plastic bags, etc
4. NON RENEWABLE RESOURCE
So, in terms of cost, Crude oil is far more economically VIABLE option to make ethylene, Chloroethyne, styrene for production of materials.
Hope this helps
2.