• Best of luck to the class of 2024 for their HSC exams. You got this!
    Let us know your thoughts on the HSC exams here
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
MedVision ad

Cost comparison of cellulose vs crude oil in the petrochemical industry (1 Viewer)

jest3r

Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2006
Messages
93
Location
Wollongong
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
If anyone knows of a website, or has a worksheet they can share that offers any sort of cost comparison of cellulose as a source of petrochemicals vs crude oil, that would be greatly appreciated :) I've searching around for a while now...still am...suprisingly it's been a bit of a dudd.

Cheers
 

tristambrown

Member
Joined
May 1, 2006
Messages
85
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
thats cos it is not practical at all so no one is doing it ...

the cost of trying to make ethene from cellulose would make the polyethylene bag that your groceries are packaged in worth more than the groceries it is supposed to hold...(that is if the reactions to get there even exist) ... i know there is defrinatley no cost effective method, but cannot confirm that "no methods at all" exist ...

there are however many other renewable options being pursued (eg phb phbv and polymers derived from milk protein etc) but these are not from cellulose
 

ossephj

New Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2004
Messages
8
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
In a exam, this type of question would be worth about 5-7 marks, and not just explaining the cost, but also its viability, usefulness and its advantages and disadvantages.

Cellulose
1. It is renewable resource, cellulose is a large component of biomass
2. Glucose can be extracted from the cellulose and fermentated to make ethanol, then to ethylene by dehydration
3. Cost is much more expensive and the processing cost is expensive. Not economically viable. Also, extracting glucose from cellulose is much exhaustive process than starch. So, the cost is high, and not viable for the production of plastic bags, etc
4. The energy input (crude oil) for fermentation/dehydration can use more crude oil than in original form

Crude oil
1. Easily cracked (catalytic or thermal) into various petrol products, and cost effective
2. Easily extracted from underground
3. Cheaper source of ethylene to make plastic bags, etc
4. NON RENEWABLE RESOURCE

So, in terms of cost, Crude oil is far more economically VIABLE option to make ethylene, Chloroethyne, styrene for production of materials.

Hope this helps
2.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top