Fuck off you cunt.I got 89 yeeeeeeeeeeeeew..!!
I got 84.5... I am disappoint. :/
Fuckin' shit.
Fuckin'g rank dropped from 2nd to 3rd, but I'm going to ask miss about a few questions because I don't understand wtf was up with some of the shit.
Fuck off you cunt.I got 89 yeeeeeeeeeeeeew..!!
I got fucking 12/15 for the multiple choice left in the exam from CSSA. WTF was question 19?!I got 85% 20/20 for multiple choice
Rank from 11th to 3rd
Comeback of the year
I got 12/15 too..I got fucking 12/15 for the multiple choice left in the exam from CSSA. WTF was question 19?!
you have two trials? wowBiology was pretty difficult. Going to lose my rank now. Oh well, second trial coming up... weighs 25%
You disgusting slut!I got 12/15 too..
But I got Q19 right, ner ner
search in google 'Ahmad shah idil' and click the first option that comes up. he did that option and his notes ads AMAZING.heyy! does anyone have good notes on genetics- code broken?? I'm willing to trade! i find genetics like impossible to understand!
I got it right. I said it wasn't relevant coz...clearly it's misquoted - You can't have a rate of temperature. And the person wanted to know about endotherms. When does the ambient temperature ever have an effect on an endotherm? Not really ever, and we quickly try to counteract temp changes. It just doesn't make sense that it would be talking about an endotherm. And wikipedia is more reliable than encyclopaedia britannica, but for reliability you need comparison and they didn't say that they had compared their sources with anything so I put unreliable. Hope this helps.Anybody else think that question 19 from the CSSA multiple choice was wrong?
From the paper:
______________________________________________________________________________
19. An endotherm has been defined as an animal that can control its body temperature by internal mechanisms.
A student researching endotherms obtained the following information from Wikipedia.
"The overall rate of an animal's body temperature increases by a factor of about two for every 10C rise in ambient temperature".
The relevance and reliability of this information from this site would be considered:
(A) NOT RELEVANT --- NOT RELIABLE
(B) RELEVANT --- NOT RELIABLE
(C) NOT RELEVANT --- RELIABLE
(D) RELEVANT --- RELIABLE
_________________________________________________________________________________
Firstly, it doesn’t make sense. How do you measure the rate of an animal’s body temperature? Secondly, how can you conclude that the article is unreliable without looking at the sources? I looked at the references to the wikipedia article from which this quote was taken after the exam and they’re all mostly from peer-reviewed journals and such. They also misquoted the actual statement:
“The overall rate of an animal's metabolism increases by a factor of about two for every 10 °C”
I chose B for the sake of pleasing the markers (since so many people have a stigma against the reliability of wikipedia sources. In my opinion it should have been D). As it turns out, the correct answer was A.
I can understand it not being reliable, but not relevant? Thoughts?