DTFM said:
It will make some of the medicine degree a bit easier, but you don't stand a better chance of getting into medicine with it.
katie tully said:
secondly it doesn't give you any more of an opportunity to get into Med than an Arts degree.
dp624 said:
I don't tihnk doing any particular course would really help or detract from your chances of med. if it were me, i'd do sometihng I like, so i could get high marks throughout the year.
Survivor39 said:
No, the chosen field of your first degree has no bearing on the selection process.
katie tully said:
They don't give special preference to somebody who has Medical Science over any other undergrad degree. They're not looking for people with a background in science specifically.
Survivor39 said:
No, MedSc does not give you a better chance of getting into medicine/dentistry.
katie tully said:
1. Uni's don't favour MedSc students over others when it comes to Grad Med
lala2 said:
As multiple people have said before, they don't take into account what degree you did previously.
sparkerasp said:
Medical Science will in no way help you get into medicine.
That is not quite correct. Your choice of undergraduate studies
do affect your chances of getting into medicine, at least officially at
Deakin School of Medicine:
Prior learning:
Applicants who have completed a major sequence in biomedical or health sciences during their undergraduate degree receive a 2% weighting.
Prior clinical experience in a health discipline:
Applicants who have completed one year of clinical practice as a registered health professional (eg dentistry, dietetics, nursing, occupational therapy, pharmacy, physiotherapy, podiatry, psychology, and speech pathology) receive a 2% weighting..
The official word at other medical schools may be that there is no discrimination between what degree you apply with,
but unofficially and perhaps during the interview stage, it does help to show a certain amount of focus and commitment of wanting to get into med and have a medical career (for eg, if two applicants are equal in every way except one has a biomedical degree and the other has an arts degree..).
IIRC, UQ School of Med has been the only school that has openly and actively gone out of their way to diversify their pool of eligible applicants by opening up application eligibility to include other degree types and expressing an interest for applicants from a wide(r) range of backgrounds, not just from biomedical backgrounds.
Survivor39 said:
What they want is someone who is committed in the study of medicine, someone who is mature (hopefully after a 3-4 year degree compared to someone who just finished high school and dooes know what he/she really wants to do) and STILL committed in getting into medicine.... Again, what they really need is someone committed to life-long learning in medicine
Sometimes, that can best be shown in the way you are committed to getting into medicine or the health-related field by the choice of undergraduate degree. Having studied or worked in the health-related field, if you are still interested in getting into medicine, that can be viewed as you making an informed decision coming from an informed background, especially after having had a (up to that point) significant involvement in the health-related area, whereupon you have potentially shown a capacity for life-long learning and involvement required in medicine.
Survivor39 said:
They will teach you from the basics.
No they don't. You are expected to have basic knowledge of biomedical concepts
before beginning the course, hence the GAMSAT test. Even so, passing the GAMSAT does not mean you have all required knowledge. If you don't, you are expected to do personal study in your own time during your degree. Presumbly you would've studied enough to gain a great GAMSAT score, but still, many students from non-biomedical backgrounds have a slight disadvantage when compared with students from biomedical backgrounds during their medical studies.
lala2 said:
This same med student did pharmacy as his previous degree, and he reckons pharmacy or any other health care profession, e.g. physio, [i probably prepares you better than medsc because the content you cover are quite similar, just tailored to a different slant depending on what it was (e.g. anatomy for physio, pharmacology for pharmacy, etc), and you get those communication and professional skills too, which medscience doesn't really offer.
Not only does it
probably prepares you better, if you look at the Deakin admissions information, they acknowledge that it is
definitely advantageous and openly desirable for future doctors to have this experience in their backgrounds.