pwoh
O_O
I'm not worried about not being able to access Myspace. The thing is, we're in an era where the Internet is a great resource for research and school work. Teachers have had entire lessons planned around the use of certain websites, only for the DET portal to have blocked these websites, so the teachers had to improvise a lesson.Exphate said:How on Earth do you see a whitelist as spending money to make education worse? It's easy to argue that the whitelist, with an allow-list is easier than getting individuals to search the net and add proxies one by one to the block list, as well as keeping the programs up to date to ensure that porn et. al. are consistantly blocked.
If it were truly a move to "stop government school students from learning through the internet" (as you so eloquently put it), the internet would be removed completely from the schools operating in the public sector. Students wouldn't have any access in school hours, to the internet AT ALL.
Your claims of corruption show once again how poorly educated (but I guess we will have to blame the DET for your failures as a student) you are on the matter.
And kids, this argument is void. Rudd is planning to introduce a pair of marvolous filters to Australia, one that is "opt out" and suitable for kids, whilst the other will ban all illegal content. Schools will be equipt with both, as well as having either their current whitelist system, or reverting back to the blacklist system of the past.
It is fairly obvious that the people who complain the most on these forums, have access to the internet, and thus are without the need for internet at school. There are disadvantaged students who are unable to access the internet outside of school hours, who are further disadvanted by the whitelisting policy, but again, Rudd plans to have laptops and DSL in all homes (although, realistically, I doubt this will occur).
So instead of worrying about not being able to access Myspace from the library, go and relax in the sun, read a book and talk to your friends. You'll be out of school soon enough.
Also, what is the point of spending billions of dollars providing internet access to school students if it is filtered to the level that it makes lessons and research difficult? They spend money to provide internet and then spend money to cripple. I don't believe that taxpayer's money should be going to this - I know it is a response to parent's paranoia of stalking, etc, but the current system is hardly efficient.
I hardly ever do research at school because half the sites I need are blocked - is this helping my education? So instead of spending my time at school doing work, I spend it chatting etc, and have to complete this work at home. The only thing that can be guranteed to work at the moment is Wikipedia (Wikipedia was even blocked at one stage) - what happened to a variety of sources? Why are keywords like "Nazi" and "weapons" blocked - what if someone wants to research that? What if somebody wanted to research crime cases involving pornography or wanted to research sexual reproduction for biology? Can they do that with the current system? No.
Millions of useful new webpages appear everyday and I doubt that there is enough efficiency in the system so that all of these are analysed and let through the filter. By the time a useful website has been submitted, scrutinised and unblocked, it would already be of no use to the student any more.
Furthermore, the BOS forums aren't blocked...now why is that? Why are educational resources blocked but not BOS forums...you can hardly say it's full of educational resources.