iceshard said:
A question for you guys: What kind of stuff did it take to get into the dis. courses?
From a bit of internet research I know you have to do well in an accelerated HSC subject, and generally be an excellent student... what achievements did you guys do to get accepted?
There is a big question mark surrounding the distinction courses- the Board of Studies is quite likely to phase out the entire Distinction programme, it has been suggested that 2009 is the final year, perhaps 2010 will be the final year. Comparative Literature was cut (2008 cohort is the final group) and Cosmology has been moved to University of New England. If another course gets the chop, it seems Cosmology will be the next to go (if they don't scrap it all entirely).
Recent statement from BOS:
BOS 57/08 (Vol 17 No 4)
At its August 2008 meeting the Board of Studies NSW determined that HSC Distinction courses are to be phased out of the curriculum, subject to the establishment of suitable alternatives for highly gifted HSC students.
Discussions are currently underway with universities to investigate future options for such students.
For 2009, the University of New England will deliver HSC Distinction courses in Philosophy and Cosmology. Information about arrangements for 2010 will be announced in due course.
My advice is to not put your bets on the distinction courses happening, as they very well might be finished by next year.
In terms of your question; the requirements are-
1. that you are an accellerated student, doing 2 or more units ahead of your cohort.
2. to have achieved an excellent standard; this standard is basically achieving a band 6 in the accelerated subject. (i believe someone here got a low band 6 and was not admitted- so i'd aim for a mid to high band 6 to be safe).
I don't believe that extra information/achievements beyond the HSC subject of acceleration- ie, general outside interests, extracirricular activity, has much bearing at all. It may have had more importance previously, but it appears the the BOS is being very selective about the numbers now, and much less open as to the criteria.