MoonlightSonata
Retired
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2002
- Messages
- 3,645
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- N/A
You can't focus on the consequences without any regard for the probability of them being true.sly fly said:If religion has made her a better person and has made her happy then how is that wasting her life?
There are two possible scenarios.
Scenario 1: Some people believe in God, others don't. They die. There was no God. Nothing happens.
Scenario 2: Some people believe in God, others don't. They die. There was a God. Those who believed in God go to heaven and those who didn't get eternal damnation.
Now tell me, using logic, what do you think would be the wiser thing to do?
If I said that, should you believe in flying pink elephants and pray to them every Tuesday, you will go to heaven where every wish is your instant command, and should you fail to do so, you will go to hell, where you will be tortured, ravished, tormented and made miserable for eternity, would you start believing in flying pink elephants?
The point is that you are falling for threats about what might happen without thinking properly about the substance of the claims. You are looking at the severity of a possible outcome, going "that is extremely good or bad" and ignoring the probability of the outcome, which many argue that you should be saying "the chance is so absolutely low that it should be ignored."
(Or possibly, "even there is a supreme being, if he was good then he wouldn't punish me for using my brain, which presumably he gave me")
(Or further, "even if there is a supreme being, who says there is an afterlife?")