B1andB2
oui oui baguette
I would argue that the intricacy of life is proof of God's existence.Whereas with god there is no objective proof of it’s existence.
I would argue that the intricacy of life is proof of God's existence.Whereas with god there is no objective proof of it’s existence.
An important point to consider. Without some form of pain, sadness or anger, how can there be happiness, joy, etc? It all seems relative. How can you be ‘happy’ if it’s all you’ve ever known? It would seem to just be the norm, and would go unappreciated.What is life without pain?
I think anyone CAN find evidence of God’s existence, it’s just whether they WANT to or notI would argue that the intricacy of life is proof of God's existence.
See life does seem highly unlikely to occur. I remember reading soo many times how when cooling down even if something almost negligible was different the universe as we know it wouldn’t have existed. With that being said it’s not an objective proof. Objective proof would be for example if God itself came down to Earth or something and spoke to all of humanity or whatever, or if someone from the dead could come back alive and bring evidence of a heaven or what not. Sure how un-probable we are to exist can suggest something external at play but suggesting is not the same as proving. There are soo many things in life that have like a 1 in millions chance of happening and still happen because that’s how probability works.I would argue that the intricacy of life is proof of God's existence.
It’s kind of similar to our evolution in knowledge of a black hole.See life does seem highly unlikely to occur. I remember reading soo many times how when cooling down even if something almost negligible was different the universe as we know it wouldn’t have existed. With that being said it’s not an objective proof. Objective proof would be for example if God itself came down to Earth or something and spoke to all of humanity or whatever, or if someone from the dead could come back alive and bring evidence of a heaven or what not. Sure how un-probable we are to exist can suggest something external at play but suggesting is not the same as proving. There are soo many things in life that have like a 1 in millions chance of happening and still happen because that’s how probability works.
You speak as though science and god cannot co-exist, when in fact they do.It’s kind of similar to our evolution in knowledge of a black hole.
Back in the old days Scientists had many theories regarding why our observations of the galaxy are not consistent with our calculations, there were theories that existed and black holes was one of them. Just like God some people believed it others didn’t and it was just a suggestion/theory. However now we actually have a real photo of a black hole and it matches everything we calculated and observed so that’s an objective proof confirming black holes in fact do exist.
Well I never said that. They may co-exist hundreds of years in the future. Maybe Science finds proof of a God existing, maybe some kind of machine is invented and is able to transport us to and from the dimension where Heaven exists. Endless possibilities. What I’m saying is I don’t believe in it right now because there’s no objective evidence.You speak as though science and god cannot co-exist, when in fact they do.
On what basis? Science and God's existence go hand in hand.Right now our current understanding of Science can not exist with God.
I will admit i have 0 knowledge on whatever you just said so unfortunately i cannot rebut, welp.Well for example if god or heaven existed it would obviously have to exist in some other higher dimension that we can not see or travel to right now. However so far only 4 dimensions have been proven with time being the 4th one. The rest of the ‘proposed’ dimensions are just theories and not proven laws, so with our current laws of Physics it can not coexist.
Yeah that’s kinda my bad I gave a really bad example that even I find weird.I will admit i have 0 knowledge on whatever you just said so unfortunately i cannot rebut, welp.
the assumption that no one causes anyone else pain was not in my statement.Without anyone causing anyone else pain, why would there be a need to suffer : (
ofc you should, everyone would be happy then. if there was a god this would be the case.If you could eliminate all pain would you?
no religions lelWhat is life without pain?
That's called confirmation bias. It's like saying i found a comic of spiderman so he must be real as wellI think anyone CAN find evidence of God’s existence, it’s just whether they WANT to or not
Eliminating all pain would in no way make all people happy imho.ofc you should, everyone would be happy then. if there was a god this would be the case.
no religions lel
That's called confirmation bias. It's like saying i found a comic of spiderman so he must be real as well
yeah that's true, if there were no pain people will just start to expect more and more and never be happyEliminating all pain would in no way make all people happy imho.
Without pain there could be no happiness, as people would have no opposite to judge it against, and hence would see it as the norm.
And I think you totally misunderstood what I said and compared it to a comic let’s keep things civil and respect other’s beliefs yeah : )
Don’t agree with the beginning of the Old Testament when God was killing people for stealing, etc.What don't you agree with the bible on, there is a strong foundation of morals even for non-believers.
100%What don't you agree with the bible on, there is a strong foundation of morals even for non-believers.
And some of the 10 commandments are Wack haha.
I’m not sure what it’s called, I’m Christian but just a bit more loose haha.100%
Which ones if you don't mind me asking?
- You shall have no other gods before Me.
- You shall not make idols.
- You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain.
- Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.
- Honor your father and your mother.
- You shall not murder.
- You shall not commit adultery.
- You shall not steal.
- You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
- You shall not covet.
Fair enough. I think the second commandment is a bit tricky because of how people might interpret it. I believe it's asking us not to make idols so that our focus on our faith in God isn't affected. Sometimes we may idolise a figure whom we think is good but isn't. Other times we might be so influenced by someone to the point where we consider them a god.I’m not sure what it’s called, I’m Christian but just a bit more loose haha.
I don’t agree with the second
I'm pretty sure supporting other religious beliefs does not necessarily imply idolising a particular key figure from a different religion. In fact, supporting other religious beliefs only serves to promote peace between different religious groups, which is definitely a Christian understanding.I try my best to support other religious beliefs too