kelboo
Member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2004
- Messages
- 266
- Location
- Sydney (the centre of the universe)
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- 2004
Pace Setter said:Of course, there's absolutely no possibility that any of that scientific evidence is incorrect. And definitely no comparison between the testing methods of science in relation to religion. Not to mention the absurd idea of both practices (religion and science) basing a significant amount of "fact" on earlier assumptions. Clearly, one is a superstition and one is irrefutable fact based on grounds that have been proven beyond any trace of doubt to anyone willing to "see the truth."
The irony is extraordinary...
Ironically some of that makes sense! Sorry to quote you but you sound a tad intelligent.
I never said that the scientific method was irrefutable and one hundred per cent accurate all of the time. I choose to believe that it is, because it is the most believable and rational explanation that we have to explain nature and the processes of our environment. "Oh, but God willed it" Just doesn't quite cut it for me.
Truth is not what religious fanatics are after. They are after a justification for their torturous course of birth life and death, or are searching for a possible reason as to exactly why they exist. So be it.
As I stated, the human being's fatal flaw to believe the impossible is amazing, if not mildly amusing.
Believe in what you will, because obviously intelligent people cannot prevent that from happening.
I'll be in the corner laughing quietly to myself because I believe I know better.
Oh, the irony.