That is untrueIs anyone using any literary critics/ theorists in their essays? I hear they only teach this stuff at selective schools?
Jan Kott may be worth a read if you're after a critic. But at this stage in the game, I wouldn't worry.Do you HAVE to add in critics for the critical study? Im doing Hamlet and it so hard to find one critics view that is very general and can fit in with all of the previous past papers questions
Do you HAVE to add in critics for the critical study? Im doing Hamlet and it so hard to find one critics view that is very general and can fit in with all of the previous past papers questions
This.Jan Kott may be worth a read if you're after a critic. But at this stage in the game, I wouldn't worry.
Critics used to be a more prominent part of the course, but it's fallen out of favour. If you haven't already got them, it's not worth your time.
It's a no for modules outside of Module B.No not just for module B - for all modules/ AOS
I doubt it (correct me if I'm wrong but isn't mod b based on providing your own judgement/interpretation?)How significant are they in Mod B (for me Hamlet)? Do you guys think a question would ever be focused around the part of the syllabus that talks about others interpretations?
You're absolutely correct! Critics aren't necessary to get a good mark at all, but they're always nice to supplement your argument if you feel they might have a useful quote or two to back it up.I doubt it (correct me if I'm wrong but isn't mod b based on providing your own judgement/interpretation?)
I don't think you should associate 'easy' with 20/20.I'm not at a selective school but we did critics for Hamlet. While they aren't necessary to get into the top band, to paraphrase my teacher, "They can be the icing on the cake if you're already up there". Having said that, you can still easily get a 20/20 without critics.